My understanding is that she was born a Smith, so that is her name. She changed her name to Jones, so that is an AKA. You can put a citation with the AKA indicating why she changed her name from Smith to Jones, but she should show with both names so those looking for Smith can find her, as can those searching for Jones. You may also want to use the change name event that was also suggested which would make the change more visible to future researchers.
I have a similar problem with a niece who lives in Greece. They actually went back and changed the family records so her step children now have birth certificates listing her as their natural mother. She doesn't want to give me any information about their real mother at all. I'm treading carefully so as to not make it a family crisis, but I think my signature line says it best. On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Colin Liddell <[email protected]> wrote: > > How does one handle this situation, do I put her down with her birth name > and then AKA with her present name or is there another way to do it? -- Jim Walton "...probe the past carefully and report it as it was, not as I wish it were" >From Evidence Explained by Elizabeth Shown Mills Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
