That's why I mentioned having the option of Manual or Automatic because I know not everyone would use the feature, but you do have a point I didn't think of and that's the time it would take to automatically set relationships every time I'd add a new person, so I withdraw my suggestion and am happy to stay with the Manual Set Relationship feature.
Ruth ----- Original Message ----- From: "CE Wood" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 1:13 PM Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationship Legacy displays the closest relationship rather than the closest DIRECT relationship. In order to have the closest DIRECT relationships even included in "View Additional Relationships," but still not displayed because they are not the closest relationship of all, I must calculate to the closest 50 blood relationships and 0 non-blood. That takes more than an hour, and my computer is powerful. Having it done automatically would be disastrous, as it could probably be done only to the closest relationship, in which I am not interested. Doing it automatically to the last blood relationship setting would certainly keep me from entering new individuals! More than an hour before I could continue?! CE -----Original Message----- From: Ruth Nerud [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 9:05 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationship Or maybe the programmers could put in an option such as "Manual" or "Automatic" like I have in Excel. I would like the Relationship to be automatic. Ruth A. Nerud [email protected] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jenny M Benson" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 10:17 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationship Brian L. Lightfoot wrote >Yet at the same time, the computing power in the average household has >gone up tremendously. Most users are no longer running 500 MHz >processors but rather 2.0 and greater GHz dual core and quad core >processors. Available system RAM is now usually a minimum of 2 GB on >32-bit systems and 4 GB or more on 64-bit systems. You can put the >"on-the-fly" computation into the same bucket as the promised source >conversion tool. In my very under-average household I will be happy if they leave the on-the-fly computation in that bucket! -- Jenny M Benson Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.435 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2678 - Release Date: 02/19/10 19:34:00 Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
