In your footnote list example, "3. 72," is it always lower numbered footnote
followed by a higher?
If it is a higher numbered footnote followed by a lower number ("72. 3"), that
means footnote 72 is linked to footnote 3; footnote 72 is the same as footnote
3. That is what is meant by "linked footnotes".
I do get correct footnoting for AKAs....so far.
CE
-----Original Message-----
From: Marvin & Angelique Welch [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 2:14 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [LegacyUG] Possible Bug? .rtf Ancestor Book, Sources for AKA's Not
Printing in Footnotes
I tried to do an ancestor book report today and here is what happens:
Problem #1
I chose to print my source citations as footnotes and have the option
checked to start a new page after each generation (the mandatory one for
footnotes under the page layout tab). I want the report in .rtf so chose
that also.
When the report prints and I examine the footnotes, all other source
citation output seems to show up properly (so far), except for ALL the
entries that were attached to an AKA.
For example:
John Smith. Another name for John Smith is Juan Smith. 3 (<-- footnote
reference)
Then below in the footnotes, the list looks like this:
3. 72
With only a number (that does not seem to point to anything!) that makes
no sense and is NOT a source listing or anything accidentally typed into
details for that source. I know what sources are supposed to be here,
but they are not printing for ANY sources connected to an AKA
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
