Nick,

I only do this type of analysis when an obvious piece of data is conflicting
with other data previously attained. Only then do I go through the steps
that you outline below. The analysis is all done on paper, maintained in a
file for that specific research problem. According to Elizabeth Shown Mills,
the last step in the process is to write a "Conclusion."

The conflicting data is entered into Legacy, for example an alternate birth.
The particular analysis steps are not entered into Legacy, however, the
"Conclusion" and reasons for that conclusion are entered into Legacy, along
with resolutions to conflicting information when necessary to support the
conclusion, in the Research Notes, of that Individual. The individuals
information is updated accordingly.

I am sure there are many other ways, however, this is how I am doing it at
the moment.

Charles E. Apple

-----Original Message-----
From: Jenny M Benson [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 9:18 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Credibility analysis of evidence

Nick Ingham wrote
I have been
studying the brilliant ‘Evidence Explained’ by Elizabeth Shown Mills  
and, in accordance with Ms Mills’ suggestions, I would like to be able
to attach a short ‘credibility analysis’ each time I extract a
particular piece of information from my sources – basically to
identify:-

(i)
whether the data’s source is an
original or derivative,

(ii)
whether the information itself
is from a primary or secondary informant, and

(iii)
whether that information is
represents direct or indirect evidence of the date, name, place, event
or circumstance I am trying to prove.

It strikes me that
this sort of analysis really ought to be attached to the specific data
somehow, each time I extract a piece of information from the source,
but I am not sure how to do so.

I would appreciate
any guidance members of the list might be able to provide as to how,
and where, this type of analysis is best entered in Legacy.




__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4895 (20100225) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com





Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Reply via email to