Garnet,

 From the original post the _APID is related to a source so I am not
sure what tag would be appropriate.

Brian
Customer Support
Millennia Corporation
[email protected]
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com

We are changing the world of genealogy!
When replying to this message, please include all previous correspondence.
Thanks.

Garnet Quigley wrote:
> What is the best way to handle the _APID when importing the ged from
> Ancestry.com into Legacy 7.4 Deluxe?   A couple of years ago there used
> to be another problem tag, _EID if I remember correctly, for which I
> used Legacy's substitute tag  _UID for the conversion. And it seemed to
> either solve the problem or at least remove it from sight.  I tried
> using the same _UID as a substitute tag this time, but Legacy still
> created hundreds of notes for the unrecognized _APID.  Thanks for a
> solution if there is one.
>
> Garnet
>
>
> Robert Carneal USA wrote:
>> That might be it, Evert. I was thinking:
>> A[ncestry] P[erson]ID.  I was comparing them to RINs.
>>
>> Robert
>>
>> At 2009-11-04  09:41 AM, you wrote:
>>> just a gues A (ncestry) P (ublication) ID
>>> Evert
>>>
>>> 2009/11/4 Mike Fry <[email protected]>:
>>>> Like one or two others, I have been experimenting with downloading
>>> a GEDCOM
>>>> file from Ancestry to see how the sources are imported.
>>>>
>>>> Well, the first thing to note is that they import in Basic Format!
>>>>
>>>> Having said that, I notice that the import procedure seems to have
>>> one or
>>>> two problems with a particular, Ancestry-defined tag - _APID. Does
>>> anyone
>>>> have any idea what this tag is trying to convey? It's not al all
>>> obvious
>>>> from an examination of the downloaded GEDCOM text, what the tag is all
>>>> about.
>>>>
>>>> In the  a g file generated from the import procedure, I see many
>>> messages of
>>>> the following form:-
>>>>
>>>>    Main Record: 0 @S1029350835@ SOUR
>>>> * Unrecog. Line for a Source  Record: 1 _APID 7572
>>>>  Placed in  Note : _APID 7572
>>>>
>>>> These, together with one or two more explicit errors that I can't
>>> correct
>>>>    Main Record: 0 @P4193015077@ INDI
>>>>  Sub Section: 1 SEX M
>>>> * Unrecog. Line for an Individual  Record: 2 SOUR @S1029764659@
>>>>  Placed in  Note - James W P Wall: SEX: SOUR @S1029764659@
>>>>  PAGE Class: RG10; Piece: 1800; Folio: 159; Page: 28; GSU roll:
>>> 838798.
>>>>  NOTE
>>>>
>>> http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=uki1871&h=14518996&ti=5538&indiv=try&gss=pt
>>>
>>>>  NOTE
>>>>  DATA
>>>>  TEXT Name:  James W P WallBirth:  abt 1865 in Cley, Norfolk,
>>> EnglandDeath:
>>>>                 _APID 7619::14518996
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Mike Fry
>
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>
>    http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
>
>    http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
>
>    http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>



Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Reply via email to