wrote >I just sent a post explaining that I just remembered from my Database >Administrator days, (a long time ago...) that the sources in FTM must >have been stored as a TABLE. That must explain the difference. >I do like Legacy, but I will recommend that they change the way that >they store sources.
Someone else has already pointed out that Legacy, being basically an Access database, *does* store its Sources, and everything else, in Tables. It is perfectly possible to access (no pun intended) your database tables directly and manipulate them from there, if you wish. Some of us sometimes find it possible do things that way which cannot be done (or only with more hassle) directly in Legacy. What we do *not* want - well, I certainly don't and I'm sure I speak for many others - is for Legacy to be changed to be like FTM. We use Legacy because it is *different* to FTM and infinitely preferable to FTM. -- Jenny M Benson Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
