T Bredin wrote >I have the same problem, for now I add to the persons' general notes >something like >BIRTH- the day of month is from K90B002 [my document coding scheme] >when this is from a different source than what I have in teh SOURCE >information. >I'm thinking of moving this kind of note to the Research Notes, as I >anticipate when I publish to a wide audience, I will not include >research notes.
But surely if the day of the month came from K90B002 and the month a year came from "X10Y0102" or whatever, then *both* documents should be cited as Sources? (With an indication that day was from one and month and year from another.) If you have "June 1900" stated in the document you have as "SOURCE information" but have derived the day from K90B002 which is only mentioned in Research Notes, when you publish to a wider audience they (the audience) will see unsourced information. -- Jenny M Benson Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
