DNA will be shaking alot of trees. Sally
In a message dated 9/3/2010 11:00:36 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [email protected] writes: That *is* how it works. One can, however, also set their relationship to the nonbiological 'parent' as step, which, indeed, is what they are. David's comment, whilst stictly genealogically accurate, is, in my view, over prescriptive, especially for users who are interested in family relationships, rather than blood lines. In fact given the historically high proportion of children who have been attributed to a spouse as their father, rather than the milkman, I would take bets that pretty well every genealogist has a non-bloodline relative somewhere in their trees. Ron Ferguson. Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
