Debra, Sorry for the post with no reply to your enquiry, hit the send button before I typed anything!
Firstly, attachments are not allowed on this list (see etiquette, below). I cannot comment on transferring from Family Search to Legacy, as I have never done it, but some points which you may find useful. Images cannot be transferred using a GEDCOM. I guess by “Census Sorter” the Source Writer system is what was actually meant, this enables the use of the provided templates for sourcing just about anything, including censuses. You can attach images to both the Master Source and the Source Detail. The help files for Source Writer gives a very good description of how to use these. I suggest that you have a look and try on the Sample Database which Legacy includes to add some sources of your own, and come back to us if you have difficulty. Ron Ferguson http://www.fergys.co.uk/ From: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 10:43 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Digital Sources Added to Legacy Have you seen the November issue of Family Tree Magazine? An archivist friend of mine emailed me a scan of an interesting article pertaining to your message here. I have attached it to this email for you. I, too, am a family historian for a reunion committee and a branch historian for another. I have inherited poritions of the research conducted by my great aunt and my first cousin once removed for both sides of my parents families. It is definitely a chore, but a pleasant one...but I don't have nearly 50 boxes. More like 17-20, and it grows weekly! I have used Family Tree Heritage Deluxe for the past 8 years and am new to the Legacy starter edition (free download). I noticed that when I imported my data, the Census records that I had scanned into my other application did not transfer. The reason why I downloaded the Legacy software was because of a blog post I read telling about the Census sorter, but I am unsure about how to go about getting the Census document scanned properly into the Legacy program...where it gets added. Can you give me a few pointers to get started on it? Much thanks, and good luck with all that documentation! Debra P.S. I tried to attach it here, but it seems that Firefox cannot accept a file that large. If you get a chance to look at an issue of Family Tree Magazine for Nov. it is called, Wide Open Spaces. On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 6:27 PM, [email protected] wrote: I see it as the issue being "saving". I was elected the Family Historian for a VERY large family last year when the person who last held the position passed away. She was dying of cancer yet never worked on transferring her info and knowledge to someone else. I always thought I would step on her toes if I tried to learn too much. I knew that she had a house fire years ago that destroyed many things and some things I have are charred. I inherited 17 boxes of unorganized, unsorted, uncomputerized data and documents. It was enough to try to tackle 4 boxes in one year (a lot were books). Last week I spoke with a relative who said that 6 months before my predecessor passed away, she asked him to help her drop off BOXES of things to FOUR different genealogical societies.. Now I not only have to digitize and enter 13 more boxes of info, but I have to go to four more places to regain 50 or more years of her research. Then I have to figure out what other places she took things too besides these four. This is no way to preserve family documentation. With Legacy you can be a much better ancestor to your descendants. God bless, Ellen ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cheryl Rothwell" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 1:35:34 PM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Digital Sources Added to Legacy It's also dangerous to rely on paper. Digital is easy to store and small enough that you can store multiple copies I can and do still view files I saved in 1988. What changes most is the medium. 5 1/4 floppies, 3 1/2 floppies, Zip drives, CDs, DVDs, external hard drives, flash drives, ??? You do have to keep up with that. I note the LDS is digitalizing the files in Granite Mountain. They know more about files and preserving files than we do and they think it is a good idea. Paper really isn't smart for me, living in hurricane heaven now or before when I lived in tornado alley - not to mention fire, flood, etc. But I think sharing your files is really the bottom line. If you only have one copy [as is common with paper] you are more likely to have a problem. On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Connie Sheets <[email protected]> wrote: > > It seems to me that anyone contemplating going digital should have a > specific, easy to implement plan for who will preserve your life's work and > how they will do it should something unexpected happen to you the day after > you throw away your last piece of paper. (Never mind keeping up with the > constant changes in formats). > > IMO, it is a dangerous step to take unless you have such a plan in place and > complete faith in your surviving family and/or friends' desire and ability to > use and maintain your computer files. > > I can't speak for others, but the people I will leave behind are more likely > to look at and keep my physical photographs and papers than my hard drive, > back-ups, CDs, etc. > > Connie Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
