Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships surety level

[Luis Salreta]

Sorry but i'm not receiving the mails so I can´t answer directly

Thanks for ll the opinions.
I use notes but they are all mixed in the same place.
The example I gave is the simplest (and is an example not a real case).
 I have lots of cases where the missing "link" is to the grandparents that only show in the marriage of some (or only one) of the grandsons.
I still think it would be more "neat" with a "relationship" surety level. All the solutions are a bit "klundge" so I think the program needs to address this.

You could also imagine in the ancestor or descendant maps, the thickness of the relationship line dependent of the surety level...
Very friendly is'nt it? :-)

L.Salreta


Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp