Re the benefits of extending your research, on two occasions I've found a
researcher on these distant lines who had old family photos.  Some were of
folks they couldnt identify--could help with that since they were my
line--and another was my grandfather as young adult which I didn't have.
Doesnt always work that way but when it does it sure is neat.
On Jul 3, 2011 4:36 PM, "CE WOOD" <[email protected]> wrote:
> One reason is that some of us have the good fortune to be direct
descendants historical people living in the 9th and 10th centuries. Primary
sources are parish registers, court documents, IPMs, Close Rolls, Feet of
Fines, et alia. If the ancestors are from England, a lifetime is not long
enough to peruse all the primary documents that are preserved by the
government. Reliable secondary sources are constantly being tweaked as
researchers now have access to more and more documents. These include the
Cockayne's Complete Peerage, Europaiche Stammtafeln, Baronetage of England,
Scottish Peerage, et alia.
>
>
> CE
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bob Vary<mailto:[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

> Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 2:15 PM
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] number of people in your file
>
>
> This may open a can of worms, but I’m having a hard time understanding the
point of having so many people in a database. What is you purpose in doing
your genealogy? Is it to have every single person in any way related to you?
Personally, I have no interest in some 13th cousin, 10 times removed. I am
only interested in my direct ancestry and possibly the siblings or cousins
of those I descend from if they have some historical significance. And at
the risk of sounding elitist, I don’t use any online databases submitted by
amateurs. In my experience they are so full of errors as to be useless. I
would rather have a small database built from original research using
primary, or reliable secondary, sources. I don’t mean this as a criticism
because everybody has their own goals and gets their enjoyment from doing
thing their own way. Just wondering.
>
>
>
> Bob
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and
on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>


Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to