On 2011/07/27 14:00, Ron Bernier wrote:

> And why should the programmers make changes to the way the program functions
> just to accommodate those who can not/will not take the time to fully read
> the help files and tool tips?  Others have made it very clear that they fully
> understood how that function works.  I really wish people would stop
> requesting changes to dumb down a program (any program) just so they do not
> have to think about what they are doing.  This suggestion completely ignores
> those folks who have made it very clear that they know how to properly use
> the function and use it regularly.

My suggestion doesn't really change the functionality of the program, or dumb it
down. It was proposed more as a means of protecting people from themselves, and
thus, a long pro v. con argument on the list. A compromise if you like. Between
those that like the functionality it gives, and those whose first inclination
when something happens that they were not expecting, is to rush to the User
Group for an answer, rather than using the available materials.

--
Regards,
Mike Fry
Johannesburg


Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


Reply via email to