<<The New Familiy Search is just trees contributed by members... It's much like the old IGI and best used for "clues", IMHO.>>
I think it is much more than that. There are many extracted records, most of which are also in FamilySearch.org, but in nFS many of them are already linked. And while there are newbie and mistake prone entries in nFS, there are also excellent family trees contributed by non-LDS as well as members. Many very careful researchers contribute their research to nFS. As with any information you find from any source, it needs to be verified, but I find very few errors in most trees, until you get far enough into the past that quality of basic sources declines. Carl Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
