Ron, Thank you for the comments.  Seems I'm not far offbase on the
alternatives available here.
I agree Process 1 is the best and simplest so far.  And it turns out I can
get, in the screen Family view the '1/2' in the child names.
Thanks.
Todd.




On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Ron Ferguson <[email protected]>wrote:

> Todd,
>
> If I understand you correctly, it would seem that in your process 1) you
> arrived at the nearest you can get to the correct resolution of the
> question
> albeit via an incorrect entry.
>
> As I understand it for the step children to appear as such then they have
> to
> be linked to both the biological and step parent(s). I am less than certain
> that to say the usage of the phrase "they had...." is incorrect. One could
> realistically argue that as at least one of them did have step children
> then
> the phrase is as accurate as can be. Actually it is quite common to see
> this. Note also that the kids will be shown with two sets of parents, again
> this is usual.
>
> Ron Ferguson
> http://www.fergys.co.uk/
>
>
> From: Todd B
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 9:40 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Show Step Children on BookRpt-Descendant Narrative
>
> From earlier emails it seems it can not be done. I.e. Show step children on
> second husbands BookRpt Narrative Descencent rpt.  I have concluded that
> the
> Report Specification seems to be that the BookRpt  Narriative Descendent
> Rpt
> only shows blood descendants.   Stepping and halving wont cause non blood
> step/half children to show.
>
> I tried 2 ways.
> 1) Innocently, and incorrectly, I entered the second wife's prior children
> (two)  as children of her and her second husband.  Then I set the
> realtionship between these children to the second husband as 'step'.   They
> show in screen family view normally. Default to biological-like. No '1/2'.
> The BookRpt  Narrative Descendant ALMOST did the trick.  It showed the
> second husband's first marrage and their kid.  It showed the second
> husband's second marriage with the kids shown as normal kids. It commented
> that the kids relationship to the husband was 'step'.  So far, so good.
>  The
> only 'wrong' thing was the narration said 'THEY' had the following children
> (the second wife's prior children).  Which biologically they did not.
>
> So I tried reality:
> 2) I unlinked the second wife's prior children from the second marriage.  I
> relinked the second wifes children to a new marriage of the second wife and
> her first husband. This is biologically correct.  The second husband's
> first
> marriage remained biologically correct.   Then I got the second wife's
> prior
> children back into her second marriage (and also the second husband's first
> marriage child), I forget how, but they are in the screen family view
> marked
> there as '1/2' and I set the kids relationship to the second marriage
> husband and wife as 'Step' appropriately.    This marriage also shows the
> husbands kid from his first marriage as '1/2'.   You can tell who the kids
> are '1/2' to by their last name.
>
> If the 'second' husband is selected, from the second marriage, his  BookRpt
> Narriate Descendant Rpt  shows his first wife and blood kid from first
> marriage, and second marriage, but- no second marriage 'step' children.  If
> the second wife is selected, from the second marriage, it  shows her  first
> marriage and blood kids from her first marriage, and second husband, but no
> 'step' from second marriage. .  I can not find a way to show all the kids
> in
> one aforementioned report.
>
> So the Report Specification seems to be that the BookRpt  Narriative
> Descendent Rpt only shows blood descendants.   Stepping and halving doesn't
> help.            Any one see it differently?
>
> So, what we need is just a little flag on the Marriage intersection that
> means 'show step children'.
> Comments--
> (end)
>
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp<http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Etiquette.asp>
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Online technical support: 
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp<http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Help.asp>
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and
> on our blog 
> (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com<http://news.legacyfamilytree.com/>
> ).
> To unsubscribe: 
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp<http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp>
>
>
>


Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to