On 2011/09/26 07:26, Tony Rolfe wrote: > I have discovered a ancestors in the 1861 UK Census. A working-class > family in Newcastle. Head, wife, daughter-in-law and grandson. All > fairly normal, except that the daughter-in-law is 7 years old, unmarried > and has a completely different surname from the other three. > > Question 1. How can this be?
It can't be a dau-in-law in the modern sense! Sounds more like a step-daughter. > Question 2. How do I record it in Legacy? Ignore this for now. Have *you* seen the 1861 image? Has it been transcribed properly? -- Regards, Mike Fry Johannesburg Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
