You could enter the fact that there is no information on your ancestors as a comment for the Master Source.
The alternative is to enter a General To Do to search that source. In the results you can record that no useful information was found. Brian Customer Support Millennia Corporation [email protected] http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com We are changing the world of genealogy! When replying to this message, please include all previous correspondence. Thanks. On 07/11/2011 11:42 PM, Jan Wilson wrote: > Yes, I do that. I also put it in the Master Source List. But either way, > I can't readily identify that its a source that I have reviewed, but has > no information on my ancestor. Sometimes, I put aside research on a > family and work on someone else. It may be months or even the next year > before I pick it back up. Then, as I begin planning the next steps in my > research, I sometimes identify the same source that has already been > reviewed. I guess I am looking for a easy to identify method to flag a > source to indicate it doesn't have data on that ancestor. Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
