Geoff, does this qualify for "locations for anyone surrounding the main person"
The person in the Family Group Record shown at the end of this message:
His Father and mother and two brothers have full details on birth, death and
locations.  One sister has birth + location and the other sister has birth +
location and death date.  The spouse has a name and no dates etc.
----------
One example that was found by the census tool:
His father had birth+death date and birth location and the mother had
birth+death date.
The person found had birth and death dates without locations.  He had 7 siblings
with no dates/no location to as much as birth+death date and no locations .

The tool logic seems inconsistent.

I feel like the tool should find people with birth and death dates that qualify
without any other requirements. It seems to me; if I do not select the "Search
List Option to Exclude individuals from the Search List with location
percentages less than: nn%" then I should get what I want.  Isn't what that
option means?
Laird

On 4/13/2012 11:53 AM, Geoff Rasmussen wrote:
> Keep in mind that Legacy is also checking surrounding family members (births
> of children, etc.) for the report's evaluation. If there are no locations for
> anyone surrounding the main person, then that person will not show up in the
> report.
>
> Thanks,
> Geoff Rasmussen
> Millennia Corporation
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> www.LegacyFamilyTree.com <http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Laird <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     Michele,
>     I did some more testing:
>     1. The census tool finds 1848 individuals for the 1930 census and I tagged
>     these
>     with tag 2.
>
>     2. Next I did a Detailed Search >
>         Look for whom?=Individual >Where to look= Birth Place>
>         How to look=Equal To>What to look for=         blank, no entry here.
>     Second Condition: AND>
>         Look for whom?=Individual >Where to look=Death Place>
>         How to look=Equal To>What to look for=         blank, no entry here.
>     Third Condition: AND>
>         Look for whom?=Individual >Where to look=Tag 2
>         How to look=Equal To>What to look for=Tagged
>
>     This search finds 349 Individuals and I looked at about 20% of these.  
> They do
>     have one or both dates and no location.
>
>     I have run check repair on this file.
>     Laird
>
>     On 4/13/2012 6:29 AM, Michele Lewis wrote:
>     > If you have no location listed at all, then Legacy won't know that they
>     should be in a census.  For example, would they be in a US census or a UK
>     one?  If the person has no locations filled in at all how would Legacy 
> know.
>     >
>     > Michele
>     >
>     > -----Original Message-----
>     > From: Laird
>     > Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 1:46 AM
>     > To: [email protected]
>     > Subject: [LegacyUG] Census Tool failure?
>     >
>     > I have 13,864 individuals in my database and I happened to notice a
>     person that wasn't listed in the census search list (see the Family Group
>     Record below).  I didn't see any reason for this person to be missed.  I
>     exported this one person to a Legacy file and the census tool still failed
>     to list him.  I didn't have
>     > the       "Exclude individuals from the Search List with location
>     percentages
>     > less than:"   option selected.
>     >
>     > I discovered if I add a birth or death location, the census tool will
>     list him.
>     > I don't know for a FACT where he was born or died so I am not going to
>     enter a location into my database.  However I could make a guess when I do
>     a census search IF he were on the list.  I feel confident this isn't the
>     only person in my database with dates but without a location.
>     > I feel like this a problem that needs to be fixed.                 I am
>     using
>     > Legacy version 7.5.0.182
>     >
>     > Anyone else think this is a problem?
>     > Thanks, Laird
>     >
>     > Family Group Record for Verl T. Pitsenbarger
>     
> ================================================================================
>     > Husband: Verl T. Pitsenbarger [11823]
>     >
>     
> ================================================================================
>     >             Born: 17 Apr 1920
>     >       Christened:
>     >             Died: 26 May 2002
>     >           Buried:
>     >         Marriage:                                 Place:
>     >
>     
> ================================================================================
>     >      Wife:
>     >
>     
> ================================================================================
>     >             Born:
>     >       Christened:
>     >             Died:
>     >           Buried:
>     >
>     
> ================================================================================
>     > Children
>     >
>     
> ================================================================================
>     > Last Modified: 12 Apr 2012
>




Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


Reply via email to