There seems to be misunderstanding here, that is where Jenny and I put them! Ron Ferguson http://www.fergys.co.uk/ GOONS #5307
"JLB" <[email protected]> wrote: >That sounds like a plan. Lots of back-tracking though. I hate the way my >cousin puts everything including street name and number into the Master >Locations and I changed them all. >--- >JL Beeken >JLog - simple computer technology for genealogists >http://www.jgen.ws/jlog/ > >On 9/8/2012 2:21 AM, Jenny M Benson wrote: >> On 08/09/2012 01:48, JLB wrote: >>> I'm about to launch into England locations. Can hardly wait. My theory, >>> so far, is to fill in the 4 blanks as applicable and either leave the >>> rest or put it under the Address. For instance, in English locations, >>> there's often a parish in a city. I put the parish under Address. How >>> this prints out in reports I have yet to see. >> >> I hate the way Reports print out if you use the Address field so I long >> ago stopped using it and followed Ron F in putting the complete address >> in the Location field. And I don't faff about with extra commas or >> trying to fit Locations to 4 elements, I just put as much or as little >> as I know. >> > Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
