I think the idea was correct--to allow long descriptions--but the implementation was flawed; original design should've considered long descriptions. It's possible they were rushing to deliver scrapbooking, and now rushing to deliver what should've been there in the first place, and will next rush to fix it again. Possibly our clammering doesn't help. Wow, am I on soapbox duty today or what? ;) --Paula in Texas
________________________________ From: Jenny M Benson <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thu, June 28, 2012 4:18:06 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] scrapbook layout <snip> I must say I was somewhat concerned when Brian said that a change had been made because of a Problem Report from "a user who uses very verbose descriptions of their photos." It was "A USER" which worried me. Are changes made because it is known that ONE person does something which might only be done by a handful of others? Surely, unless there is an obvious error in the programming things should only be changed because A GREAT MANY people ask for a new feature or a change to an existing one and there is a consensus that it would be an improvement? This particular example, of a neat and economic layout of scrap-book pages no longer being possible, does seem to be a retrograde step. -- Jenny M Benson <snip> Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
