Please remember to trim off all the old tag lines and the message(s) you're not specifically responding to...
I would recommend that you put an estimated "before" date based on the birth of the oldest child, if known. If you have marriage dates of some of the spouses but not others and know the order, it's safe to put in "before" the marriage to the subsequent spouse - or "after" if it's a subsequent marriage. I have some I've entered that way and it works fine. Sincerely, Sherry Technical Support Legacy Family Tree On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Sandra Hopgood <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for the input. > I have avoided estimated marriage dates because with some it would be pure > guess work. > HOWEVER, prompted by Marys suggestion I put #1 or #2 in the marriage dated > field. I thought it would be rejected as an incorrect date format but it > wasn't. > The chart boxes are now in the marriage order and show the #1 and #2 on the > date line. > The problem is solved but it would have been so much easier to be able to > tick a box to indicate the order of undated marriages. > Thanks again > Sandra > > Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
