Cheryl, While I respect your opinion, I do resent having my personal decision not to link my Legacy file to FS classified as masochistic. I can and do still use the FS database. It is my personal choice to perform my searches manually and then make a conscious decision whether or not to incorporate the search results into my database.
Ron Bernier Woonsocket, RI Sent from my iPhone On Sep 13, 2013, at 7:17 PM, singhals <singh...@erols.com> wrote: > FTR: My comment addressed ONLY the data on FS, not data on > one's own computer. Because I watched it happen one day at > the FHC, I know it happened and I know it was reported > up-stream to the programmers. I've not had time or > inclination to test it recently to see if they fixed it. > > However, IMO it is a bit masochistic to refuse to use their > on-line, free, digital records. Since the only date > associated with those is the date IN the document itself, > it's stable...if the document was dated 1741 yesterday, > it'll be dated 1741 tomorrow. > > Cheryl > > > > > Ronald Bernier wrote: >> This is yet another example of why I will not use >> FS.Overall, linking to FS seems to be creating problems that >> far outweigh any benefits.I will stick with manually >> searching FS and/or Ancestry.If any changes are made or data >> added to my database, it will be by my choice only. >> >> Ron Bernier >> Woonsocket, RI >> Sent from iCloud >> >> >> On Sep 13, 2013, at 08:55 AM, singhals <singh...@erols.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I wouldn't be surprised to learn that FS changed the >>> last-modified date in one's desktop data. I know for a fact >>> that merely /looking/ at the details at FS creates a >>> change-record and stamps you as the maker of the last change. >>> >>> Cheryl >>> >>> Bob Janice wrote: >>>> Since it appears that my dates have changed also, I did a >>>> little bit of >>>> playing around tonight trying to pinpoint the problem. >>>> What made me >>>> curious was the fact that some people said their dates >>>> did change while >>>> others said they didn't. >>>> I noticed that the last modified date would change if I >>>> logged into >>>> Family Search from within Legacy and simply looked at the >>>> possible >>>> matches for an individual. I simply looked - didn't >>>> update any of the >>>> information either from or to Family Search. >>>> If someone else could take a look at this it MAY explain >>>> why some >>>> peoples dates changed and others did not. Perhaps those >>>> that did had >>>> accessed Family Search and those that didn't did not >>>> access it. Just a >>>> thought . . . Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
