Perhaps not unreasonable, but probably unrealistic. I once ran a webpage through one of the verifiers and it detested each and every one of my alt-img tags; the page passed verification ONLY after I changed all the alt-img tags to "eye candy". That was the last time I used a verifier.
Cheryl Ron Ferguson wrote: > Gene, > > I do agree with you, and I do not expect Legacy to produce a fully furnished > website, anymore than I expect it to act as a word processor. > > However, I do not think it unreasonable to expect the web output to be bug > free in exactly the same way as we expect the rtf output to be. > > Ron Ferguson > http://www.fergys.co.uk/ > > -----Original Message----- > From: Gene Young > Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 3:01 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Webpages > > > I am still amazed by the number of people that believe that a genealogy > program should also be a state of the art, do everything for me, web > designer. If you want a pretty web page, learn how. There are plenty of > sites available to learn enough to achieve that end. I prefer that my > genealogy program concentrate on genealogy and set their programming > resources to that end. > > For my web pages I "massage" the Legacy pages with some simple and basic > HTML and they come out acceptable. I do believe in content first, fluff a > distant second. > > > Gene Young > Researching Young, Harer, Cox& Sallada > With Legacy Family Tree > http://myyoungs.atspace.com/index.htm > Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
