Brian/Support wrote: > Ron, > > Since the spouse does not exist there should be no way to set them to > private nor invisible. If you were able to do so please tell me how you > did it? I also do not know what you are referring to re the affects of > adopted children of the real person. Please start a new thread with an > explanation of what you did to test this. As I also reported, we have a > problem report in the system that the descendant chart should be leaving > the name of the non-existent spouse blank instead of using "unknown".
This probably falls into the "none of my beeswax" category, but from a programming standpoint ... HOW would the program distinguish between a man (or woman) who is deliberately omitted and one whose name is not-yet-known? Presumably a tic-box or toggle? Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
