Yes, it is. CE
From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 16:19:33 -0800 “in my 100+ generations”That is a bit to many, I think you need to do another count?That is back to the BC time period? Thanks,David C AbernathyEmail disclaimers----------------------------------------------------------------------------This message represents the official view of the voices in my head.----------------------------------------------------------------------------http://www.SchmeckAbernathy.com== All outgoing and incoming mail is scanned by F-Prot Antivirus == From: CE WOOD [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 4:09 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages To get a complete picture, you also need to do the paragraph 3 search for females. There are more marriages where the ancestry of the wife is unknown, but there are several in my 100+ generations where the ancestry of the husband is unknown. To be thorough, do both. Considering the number of generations I and others have, I do hope Legacy will soon include the ability to tag Marriage Tags to accommodate tracing. CE > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages > Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 16:22:49 -0600 > > Marriage Tags and Individual Tags are separate. Unfortunately, there is not > yet an advanced tagging function for the Marriage Tags. They can only be > turned on/off one at a time. > > Best I can think of is to use advanced tagging to tag your direct ancestors > (exclude siblings, etc, and limit to the desired number of generations. > > You can then create a search list based on that tag and perhaps limit the > search list to just the males. Then you could go through that search list to > set the marriage tags. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bernd Hornung [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 3:43 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages > > I would like to tag all direct ancestor marriages to tagged 8th and 9th > generation grandparents. I have them tagged #1 and have a search list. > > Is there a way to use this to tag the intervening marriages as marriage tag > #1. This presumes that the tags are different between general and marriage > tags. If not I can use a different tag #. > > I would like to use the tags as a research guide and not have to work down > the marriage list (8400) one by one, not knowing right off, which are direct > ancestors and which are 5th cousins 5x removed. > > Any pointers to directions or assistance is appreciated. > > Thanks > > Bernie Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
