That's Easy??????

Aside from that - not everyone uses (or wants to use) LTools - and I'd
rather not clear my UserID's just to set reminders or tag more than one
marriage at a time.


On 11 January 2014 13:00, Ron Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:

> I actually use the marriage tags quite a bit.  Here is a help file that I
> sent out recently to some of the local Legacy users.  It sets the marriage
> record "Anniversary Reminder" but logic to set any of the marriage tags is
> similar.  The process makes it easy to set all the Birthday Reminders and
> Anniversary Reminders for descendants of select ancestors...ie living
> cousins, etc.
>
> How to set Anniversary and Birthday Reminders for select individuals
> 1)    Clear tag5 and all UserIDs for everyone in the Legacy database.
> You may also want to clear all Anniversary and Birthday Reminders so those
> set by this procedure are not mixed with others.
> 2)    Make list of RINs for grandfathers or great-grandfathers or any
> other group.
> 3)    Set tag5 for all descendants (including spouses) of RINs from step
> 2.  Easily done with a Focus Group.  First “Clear List” to start with an
> empty Focus Group.  Then click “Add an Individual and Descendants” for each
> RIN.  Then Search>Miscellaneous>Focus Group>Create List>Options>Advanced
> Tagging>Tag on #5>Everyone in Search List.  Exit from Legacy.
> 4)    Set UserID for all biological descendants of the RINs from step2
> with Ltools>Set Special User IDs.  Set radio button “Fill descendant’s User
> ID with Text + Henry Number”.  Enter “HN-“ in the Text field.  Check the
> box “Exclude Non-Biological Relationships”.  Click “Run” and “Continue”.
> The number of rows (User IDs for individuals) affected will be displayed.
> Exit from Ltools.
> 5)    This SQL script will set the Anniversary Reminder for all marriage
> records where the marriage status is blank, “This couple did not marry” is
> unchecked, both spouses are living and have tag5.
> UPDATE (tblMR INNER JOIN tblIR ON tblMR.IDIRHusb=tblIR.IDIR) INNER JOIN
> tblIR AS tblIR_1 ON tblMR.IDIRWife=tblIR_1.IDIR SET tblMR.ReminderTag = 1
> WHERE (((tblMR.IDMS)=1) And ((tblMR.NotMarried)=0) And ((tblMR.IDIRHusb)>0)
> And ((tblMR.IDIRWife)>0) And ((tblIR.Tag5)=1) And ((tblIR_1.Tag5)=1) And
> ((tblIR.Living)=0) And ((tblIR_1.Living)=0));
> 6)    This SQL script will set the Birthday Reminder for husbands of the
> marriages affected in step 5.
> UPDATE tblMR INNER JOIN tblIR ON tblMR.IDIRHusb=tblIR.IDIR SET
> tblIR.ReminderTag = 1 WHERE (((tblMR.ReminderTag)=1));
> 7)    This SQL script will set the Birthday Reminder for wives of the
> marriages affected in step 5.
> UPDATE tblMR INNER JOIN tblIR ON tblMR.IDIRWife=tblIR.IDIR SET
> tblIR.ReminderTag = 1 WHERE (((tblMR.ReminderTag)=1));
> 8)    This SQL script will set the Birthday Reminder for all living
> biological descendants from step 4.  Some of these may already have been
> set in step 6 or step 7 if they were linked to an active marriage.
> UPDATE tblIR SET tblIR.ReminderTag = 1 WHERE (((tblIR.UserRef) Like
> "HN-*") AND ((tblIR.Living)=0));
> 9)    Each of the SQL scripts could be executed by Ltools>“Run Raw SQL”.
> Also, Ltools>”Set Birthday/Anniversary/Death Reminders” could be used to
> turn off or turn on the reminders.  You will first have to set a tag for
> the individuals or marriages that this process will affect.  The birthday
> reminders can be tagged with Search>Detailed Search>Individual>Birthday
> Reminder>Equal to>Checked>Create List>Options>Advanced Tagging>Tag on
> #1>Everyone in Search List.  The anniversary reminders can be found with
> similar logic but Legacy does not provide a method for setting the marriage
> tags.  This SQL script will set marriage tag5 if the Anniversary Reminder
> is set and then use it in Ltools.
> UPDATE tblMR SET tblMR.Tag5 = 1 WHERE (((tblMR.ReminderTag)=1));
> 10) This final search may find a few non-biological living descendants or
> connected spouses for whom you may want to set the Birthday Reminder.  They
> might be step children of a biological descendant, spouse of a deceased
> descendant, a divorced spouse, an unmarried spouse, or other linked
> individuals.  Search>Detailed Search>Individual>Tag5>Equal to>Tagged and
> Individual>Birthday Reminder>Equal to>Unchecked and Individual>Living>Equal
> to>Yes.
> 11) A marriage marked “This couple did not marry” should be considered as
> having status “Unmarried” even if that status has not been explicitly
> entered.  They will be excluded like the divorced spouses if status is
> non-blank.  This SQL script can detect those who “did not marry” with blank
> marriage status.
> SELECT tblMR.IDMR, tblMR.IDIRHusb, tblMR.HusbSurname, tblMR.HusbGivenName,
> tblMR.IDIRWife, tblMR.WifeSurname, tblMR.WifeGivenName, tblMR.IDMS,
> tblMR.NotMarried FROM tblMR WHERE (((tblMR.IDMS)=1) AND
> ((tblMR.NotMarried)=1));
>
>
>   On Thursday, January 9, 2014 9:47 PM, CE WOOD <[email protected]> wrote:
>   Yes, it is.
>
>
> CE
>
> ------------------------------
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages
> Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 16:19:33 -0800
>
> “in my 100+ generations”
> That is a bit to many, I think you need to do another count?
> That is back to the BC time period?
>
> Thanks,
> David C Abernathy
> Email disclaimers
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This message represents the official view of the voices in my head.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.SchmeckAbernathy.com <http://www.schmeckabernathy.com/>
> == All outgoing and incoming mail is scanned by F-Prot Antivirus  ==
>
> *From:* CE WOOD [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 09, 2014 4:09 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages
>
> To get a complete picture, you also need to do the paragraph 3 search for
> females. There are more marriages where the ancestry of the wife is
> unknown, but there are several in my 100+ generations where the ancestry of
> the husband is unknown. To be thorough, do both.
>
> Considering the number of generations I and others have, I do hope Legacy
> will soon include the ability to tag Marriage Tags to accommodate tracing.
>
>
> CE
>
> > From: [email protected]
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages
> > Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 16:22:49 -0600
> >
> > Marriage Tags and Individual Tags are separate. Unfortunately, there is
> not yet an advanced tagging function for the Marriage Tags. They can only
> be turned on/off one at a time.
> >
> > Best I can think of is to use advanced tagging to tag your direct
> ancestors (exclude siblings, etc, and limit to the desired number of
> generations.
> >
> > You can then create a search list based on that tag and perhaps limit
> the search list to just the males. Then you could go through that search
> list to set the marriage tags.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bernd Hornung [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 3:43 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [LegacyUG] Tagging marriages
> >
> > I would like to tag all direct ancestor marriages to tagged 8th and 9th
> generation grandparents. I have them tagged #1 and have a search list.
> >
> > Is there a way to use this to tag the intervening marriages as marriage
> tag #1. This presumes that the tags are different between general and
> marriage tags. If not I can use a different tag #.
> >
> > I would like to use the tags as a research guide and not have to work
> down the marriage list (8400) one by one, not knowing right off, which are
> direct ancestors and which are 5th cousins 5x removed.
> >
> > Any pointers to directions or assistance is appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Bernie
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and
> on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and
> on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to