Individual died: Jun Q 1924
buried: 16 Jun 1924
Showing the death as Jun Q 1924 would be quite acceptable if this is the
information shown on the available death record. I tend to use abt 16 Jun 1924
as it should be a closer indicator of the actual date - as burials generally
take place soon (days) after the death.
Bob A
-----Original Message-----
From: C.G. Ouimet [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 3:54 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Another Potential Problem Bug
I understand the bug but why a 2nd Qtr death when the burial is known as Jun 16?
C.G. Ouimet
Kingston ON
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
