Pat, If there is an oral tradition for these lines being part of your family and someone has gone to the trouble to disprove it with DNA, all the more reason to include a note on your proved ancestor.
Cathy > Pat Hickin <mailto:[email protected]> > Tuesday, 20 May 2014 4:36 AM > Thanks, Paula, > > In both cases, these are "royal" lines and both are disproved by DNA > evidence as well as by more traditional research. In one case there > was only oral tradition (from my father, his father, etc.) for the > descent and I never had a real link. In the other case no one ever > found any documentation to support the link & it has been firmly > disproved by DNA testing. > > Pat > > Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
