I am blessing Cathy's name, I had over 120 people who were born way
more than 110 years ago marked as living, until I took her advice -
Thanks Cathy!
Eliz
Not Today and Not without a Fight
(Anon)
For all that has been, thanks.
For all that will be, yes.
(Dag Hammarskjold)
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 10:15 AM, R G Strong-genes
<rgstrongge...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Learned something new, I ran it and found 10 individuals with no birth or
> death dates and it used the spouses and/or siblings bithdates to set it.
> Some of those had no marriage dates but all had either spouse or siblings
> with a birthdate. When you click on the Tools>Advanced Set Living it askes
> the same question as in the Customize 2.3 that I referred to previously.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cathy Pinner
> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 6:53 PM
> To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] "not living" triggers
>
> If you have the Deluxe version, you can use the Tool - Advanced Set
> Living. This takes in more parameters than the automatic change to dead
> on save. It should mark your couple married in the 1700s dead.
> The Advanced Set Living tool is one of those to run periodically. It
> supplies a list of anyone it changes from Living to Dead.
>
> Cathy
>
>> R G Strong-genes <mailto:rgstrongge...@gmail.com>
>> Wednesday, 4 June 2014 2:21 AM
>> Cheryl,
>> Where did the program ask for marriage parameters? In version 8,
>> Customize
>> setting 2.3 is where you set the Age to resume a Person is Dead. For
>> this to
>> do so, as I said previously the individual must have a date entered in
>> the
>> birth field (not sure about the chr field) for it to work on entry or
>> when
>> you Apply to the Set as dead if over ? field.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: singhals
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 12:50 PM
>> To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
>> Subject: [LegacyUG] "not living" triggers
>>
>> Since the program asked me for parameters with the marriage
>> date with it could assume "living", I /assumed/ that if the
>> marriage occurred in the 1700s, the program would use that
>> instead of a death date to mark the couple not-living.
>>
>> It doesn't seem to. So, Should it be?
>>
>> If not, then why'd it ask?
>>
>>
>> Cheryl
>>
>
> --
> Russell G. Strong
> P. S. Check out Legacy Family Tree today! This full featured genealogy
> program can be downloaded FREE at
> http://www.legacyfamilytreestore.com/Articles.asp?ID=133&Click=1114
> Oh so many branches and not enough time to check out all the roots!!!.
> Check out my Genealogy Pages at http://www.rgstrong-genes.com .
>
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on
> our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
