MikeFry wrote: > On 13 Aug 2014 17:37, Sherry/Support wrote: > >> We do have a suggestion listed to be able to include time with the date but >> I don't know if this is something the programmers will be able to implement >> or not. Honestly, this is such a rare request.... You're the second person >> on the suggestion list..... > > No. It's not that important. I don't have that many sets of twins where I > actually have exact information on their appearance into the world. This > particular pair, born and died in 1910, would have been my father's brothers, > but were according to the death certificates, born premature. > > I suppose it the order of twins only really becomes important when there's an > inheritance to be be handed out. this hasn't been much of a problem with my > families :-) >
When I know that the children were born in a specific order, but don't know a date for any of them, I give them a first initial A, B, C, D, and so on so they will sort as A B C D instead of by the actual first name. Sometimes I've remembered to put () around it, even. I've left it there until I've found a date for all of 'em. Clearly, I have to remember to fix that in print-outs, but since I rarely have anyone to share with it's not a big issue. Cheryl Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
