John,

You seem to have a lot of anxiety over this issue, to the point of having
hallucinations. If you want to submit this as a suggestion for an
enhancement to the Legacy program, please visit
http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Suggest.asp. We are always seeking new ways
to make Legacy better.

Jim,
Legacy Technical Support



-------- Original Message --------
> From: "John Lisle" <leg...@johnlisle.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 12:38 PM
> To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Any Way to Mark a PERSON as Never Married?
>
> JIm,
>
> Sure... I do it all the time, but I was not talking about marriage
status.
>
> I was talking about the checkbox "This person was never married and
> has no children" which is the subject of this thread.
>
> I know that a user can decide that the word "married" in that
> checkbox can mean  whatever they want it to mean, but I hallucinate
> that most users assume it means just what it says "married" - formal
> ceremony with "binding" contract assumption.
>
> But, with the checkbox being a combination of two attributes and no
> way to identify what means married, the use of the checkbox will be,
> in my opinion, inconsistent or ambiguous between various users.
>
> john.
>
> At 02:39 PM 4/7/2015, Jim Terry/Support wrote:
> >John,
> >
> >Legacy users are free to create whatever Marriage Status they want and
> >create whatever wording options they want to handle the majority of the
> >most bizarre, unlikely relationships or non-relationships they can
think
> >about.
> >
> >Jim
> >Legacy Technical Support
> >
> >
> >-------- Original Message --------
> > > From: "John Lisle" <leg...@johnlisle.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 11:30 AM
> > > To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
> > > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Any Way to Mark a PERSON as Never Married?
> > >
> > > Jim,
> > >
> > > I agree but...
> > >
> > > I think that this most people think of this attribute of "Never
> > > Married" as being no formal marriage event, not no relationships.
> > >
> > > Further, even were it to mean No Relationships, unless we have
> > > perfect knowledge of the person's life, we would have to say "No
> > > KNOWN Relationships" and, of course, that attribute could also mean
> > > no known marriages.
> > >
> > > More fuel to why those attributes need to be split. (I still think
> > > those attributes need to be combines with Child Status items as
> > > described earlier.)
> > >
> > > If a man was a sperm donor, he likely has children although he may
> > > not know who they are. And, unless one of those children later
> > > determines his/her biological paternity, that passing on of genes
> > > will never be known.
> > >
> > > Of course, there is the other case of surrogate motherhood. It can
> > > either be based on placing fertilized egg in surrogate or it could
be
> > > that surrogate mother provides the egg.
> > >
> > > Did you know that 3 of Mitt Romney's son Tagg's children were from a
> > > surrogate mother?
> > >
> > > Modern science and 21st century laws are making relationships much
> > > more complex... :-)
> > >
> > > john.
> > >
> > > At 11:10 AM 4/7/2015, Jim Terry/Support wrote:
> > > >In a case of in vitro fertilization there is a father and he is
Unknown.
> >We
> > > >haven't started cloning people yet, so for now there is still a
> >biological
> > > >father and biological mother.
> > > >
> > > >Jim
> > > >Legacy Technical Support
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >-------- Original Message --------
> > > > > From: "MikeFry" <emjay...@gmail.com>
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 2:50 AM
> > > > > To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
> > > > > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Any Way to Mark a PERSON as Never
Married?
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2015/04/07 00:19 AM, Kelly Booth wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I have a in vitro fertilization in my tree - she never married
but
> >I
> > > >can't check
> > > > > > that box because it includes "no children" and that is not the
> >case.
> > > > >
> > > > > That's still a "relationship". Even if the father is unknown, as
is
> > > >likely in
> > > > > that case.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Mike Fry (Jhb)
> > >
>
>
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
>
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
>
> Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com
>
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and
on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
>
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Legacy User Group guidelines:

http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com

Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to