I'm not advocating one side or the other to this potential programming change 
but I'm just curious as to why the change is up to the programmers. You'd think 
the design and direction of the software would be an executive decision or at 
least coming from a management design team. Programmers usually don't make this 
decisions as they are just told what to accomplish and are left in the dark 
with the mushroom fertilizer.

Brian in CA
No anxiety here. No rain either.



-----Original Message-----
From: Sherry/Support [mailto:she...@legacyfamilytree.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 1:35 PM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Any Way to Mark a PERSON as Never Married?

It's already on the suggestion list. Whether or not the programmers will change 
it back is up to them


Sincerely,
Sherry
Technical Support
Legacy Family Tree


On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Jim Terry/Support <jimte...@legacyusers.com> 
wrote:
> John,
>
> You seem to have a lot of anxiety over this issue, to the point of
> having hallucinations. If you want to submit this as a suggestion for
> an enhancement to the Legacy program, please visit
> http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Suggest.asp. We are always seeking new
> ways to make Legacy better.
>
> Jim,
> Legacy Technical Support
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
>> From: "John Lisle" <leg...@johnlisle.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 12:38 PM
>> To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
>> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Any Way to Mark a PERSON as Never Married?
>>
>> JIm,
>>
>> Sure... I do it all the time, but I was not talking about marriage
> status.
>>
>> I was talking about the checkbox "This person was never married and
>> has no children" which is the subject of this thread.
>>
>> I know that a user can decide that the word "married" in that
>> checkbox can mean  whatever they want it to mean, but I hallucinate
>> that most users assume it means just what it says "married" - formal
>> ceremony with "binding" contract assumption.
>>
>> But, with the checkbox being a combination of two attributes and no
>> way to identify what means married, the use of the checkbox will be,
>> in my opinion, inconsistent or ambiguous between various users.
>>
>> john.






Legacy User Group guidelines:

http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com

Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to