Just how the heck can you determine that an individual had no relationships? Most people today have many, many relationships over the course of a lifetime, and some even have many simultaneously!
Of course, not all of them are long-term relationships. I suppose someone brilliant decided marriage was outdated, so eliminated "never married" as an option. THAT is possible to determine! "No relationships" is NOT! Let's see, that means: no mistresses, no concubines, no extra-marital affairs, no one night flings, etc. But "no relationships"? Legacy needs to get out more. CE > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Customize wording? > Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 20:09:19 -0400 > > The wording for no relationships and had no children is not adjustable > by the user nor is it selectable for each individual. > > Brian > Customer Support > Millennia Corporation > [email protected] > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com > > On 19/08/2015 5:35 PM, Gene Wheeler wrote: > > Before v. 10, I believe, if a person never married, the individual's view > > could be set to state "Never married". Now it says "No relationships". Is > > it possible for me to somehow customize this wording, going back to the > > orginal version as the default, but using the new wording when appropriate? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Gene Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
