Denise, With a Shared Event, you don't have to go to each participant and find the Event to add a note specific for them. You can add a note from the Edit Role button. When on the screen where you add the people you are sharing the event with, highlight the person and click Edit Role and then add your note specific to that person. Apart from finding them in the Selection List/Name list so you can share the event, you don't have to go to them at all.
I wrote another email on Event Clipboard and Shared events on this thread out of order. For some reason this thread is really broken up in my email program. Cathy Denise Moss-Fritch wrote: > > Sue and Marlene, > > So, you are commenting about a shared event, not copying and pasting > an event that Boyd mentions? > > Yes, I note that selecting Share Event offers fields for a name and > role, but not a note specific for each participant of the event. To > gain access to a note field for each participant, the user needs to go > to the event in each participants event records and add data in the > 'Notes (specific to this person's role)' tab. > > Thanks for the clarification. Certainly something to think about. > > Denise > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marlene Williamson [mailto:marlenew...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2015 1:38 PM > To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com > Subject: Re[2]: [LegacyUG] Linking Source Citations > > I too have struggled with this (as a long time TMG user). The issue > for me is that when you do link individuals to the event you can't add > specific details to each individual without first closing down the > main individual and then going into each other one in turn to add the > detail. Drives me bonkers and adds so much more time to the recording. > > Marlene > > On 21/12/2015 7:55:58 AM, "Denise Moss-Fritch" > <d.mossfri...@comcast.net> wrote: > >> >> Sue, >> >> >> >> As someone who is ‘evaluating’ half a dozen different genealogy >> software to decide ‘where to go next’, I am very curious about your >> comment. You wrote: >> >> >> >> “And Legacy still can't handle linking of individuals to one event >> without a whole lot of hair-tearing.†>> >> >> >> Please be a lot more specific in describing what you mean in your >> comment. I am very interested in understanding just what you meant. >> Thanks. >> >> >> >> Denise >> >> >> >> From: Sue [mailto:j...@wvi.com] >> Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2015 10:40 PM >> To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com >> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Linking Source Citations >> >> >> >> And Legacy still can't handle linking of individuals to one event >> without a whole lot of hair-tearing. I miss TMG soooo much. Legacy is >> OK, but it isn't a very good relational database. >> Sue Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
