hi Diane, thanks for your reply. By adding the book as a source in the
name field, I assume that's what I would be doing (using the book as a
source for those relationships).
Barton
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Diane wrote:
Barton;
You could also use the book as a source for child/parent relationships.
Diane
From: LegacyUserGroup [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Barton Lewis
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 7:45 PM
To: 'Legacy User Group' <[email protected]>
Subject: [LegacyUG] sourcing question
As a little diversion to all the questions about Legacy 9, I found a
biographical sketch of my ancestor’s brother in a Texas history book
published in 1893. It contains a trove of information about my
ancestor’s family and that of his parents, presumably from the subject
who was 44 years old at the time. The names of his siblings and aunts
and uncles and all their spouses are included. As a source for these
names, I’m wondering where to best enter them; I usually put census
entries into the birth field, since date and place of birth are always
identified (usually). Since date and place are not included in the
sketch, should the source be added to the person’s name? I usually
don’t input sources into the name field but this seems to make the best
sense. Any thought would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Barton
--
LegacyUserGroup mailing list
[email protected]
To manage your subscription and unsubscribe
http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
<http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com>
Archives at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/>
--
LegacyUserGroup mailing list
[email protected]
To manage your subscription and unsubscribe
http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
Archives at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
