It could be that the child/children are biological. I've been told that many times couple "marry" a
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 7:59 PM Cathy Pinner <[email protected]> wrote: > Pete, > > You create a marriage to Unknown/Blank depending on your setting at > Options - Customise 3.11 by choosing to add mother or father to an > individual. > This may help: > https://news.legacyfamilytree.com/legacy_news/2018/08/tuesdays-tip-linking-to-a-single-parent-beginner.html > If or when you find the other parent you can add them in in place of the > Unknown/Blank supplied by Legacy. > > Cathy > > > Pete wrote: > > > I have a husband and wife that were married in the mid 1700's. They had a > total of eight children. A recent find was wills for both. The issue is > that the transcriptions indicate that two children were possibly born > before > the marriage. Specifically, it suggests that both the husband and the wife > had at a children before there were married. No previous marriage has been > found or indicated. > I believe this could be shown if I record both with a previous marriage to > "unknown" individuals. I am also thinking about leaving the name empty. > I am getting confused with the various options. Is there a way to indicate > a previous marriage, without using a individual's name? > Any suggestion would be helpful. > > Thanks > > Pete > > > > -- > > LegacyUserGroup mailing list > [email protected] > To manage your subscription and unsubscribe > http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com > Archives at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > -- Life is not waiting for the storm to pass but learning to dance in the rain.
-- LegacyUserGroup mailing list [email protected] To manage your subscription and unsubscribe http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
