No one would confuse Boston, MA, or Boston, MA, USA for being in South Africa.  
Hoosierly yours,
James G. Hermsen8108 Laura Lynne LaneIndianapolis, IN 46217
317-679-1466 cell317-881-4600 land line 

   On ‎Saturday‎, ‎August‎ ‎03‎, ‎2019‎ ‎11‎:‎46‎:‎18‎ ‎PM‎ ‎EDT, Donna Newell 
<djnewel...@gmail.com> wrote:  
 
 This is very wise.  Avoid confusion.  Avoid abbreviations, USA could be United 
States or Union of South Africa.  Use appropriate names, enter place as it is 
in the time period that the event takes place.  Study up on genealogy standards 
and practices.

Sent from my iPad
On Aug 3, 2019, at 9:02 PM, Christopher Seward Sr. <csewar...@gmail.com> wrote:


 

James,
 
It makes perfect sense.  "New York" - is that New York City, New York County, 
or New York State?
 
New York ,,,USA would be city
 
,New York ,,USA would be county
 
,,New York ,USA would be state
 
If you can tell which one someone meant by just entering "New York", you need 
to play the lottery immediately. LOL
 
For those of us who are NOT psychic, please use that proper standard, and put 
what ever you please in the notes.
 
My humble opinion - tempered with 35+ years of experience as a professional 
genealogist.
 
Christopher
 
 On 8/3/2019 2:07 PM, James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup wrote:
  
 
What does not make sense is seeing something like:  , , , Indiana, United 
States of America. when a simple IN  would do.  Or: , , , Berlin, Democratic 
Republic of Germany.  You can find whatever available record in  Berlin today 
regardless if it was Prussia, Imperial Germany, Natzi Germany, East Germany or 
West Germany or Occupied American Sector, French Sector, or British Sector, or  
Federal Rpublic of Germany.  This junk belongs in the notes not in the primary 
entry. 
  
   Hoosierly yours, 
  James G. Hermsen 8108 Laura Lynne Lane Indianapolis, IN 46217 
  317-679-1466 cell 317-881-4600 land line    
  
      On ‎Saturday‎, ‎August‎ ‎03‎, ‎2019‎ ‎09‎:‎22‎:‎00‎ ‎AM‎ ‎EDT, 
Christopher Seward Sr <csewar...@gmail.com> wrote:  
  
     James, I understand where you're coming from. I just think that handling 
data in a manner that deviates from the standard is inviting data integrity 
issues. As I said,  the choice is yours. Just be aware of the lasting issues it 
will cause for those who come after. 
  Christopher   
   On Sat, Aug 3, 2019, 4:59 AM James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup 
<legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com> wrote:
  
   Exactly my point.  Putting historical location in the notes maintains all 
the information one needs and still be sensible and useful to family members.  
If people import information without looking at the notes, then they are not 
being a good genealogist.   It tells me that they just copy things for numbers, 
not for reliable and useful information to share. 
   Hoosierly yours, 
  James G. Hermsen 8108 Laura Lynne Lane Indianapolis, IN 46217 
  317-679-1466 cell 317-881-4600 land line  
  
     On ‎Friday‎, ‎August‎ ‎02‎, ‎2019‎ ‎08‎:‎51‎:‎50‎ ‎AM‎ ‎EDT, Bill Hoff 
<bh...@mchsi.com> wrote:  
  
    Then one cannot find on a map if historic locations used. With many 
relatives in West Virginia I have this  problem. WV did not become a state 
until June 20, 1863.  On top of that many counties within the state were 
divided over many years, far too many  for me to recall them all. Then there is 
the problem of knowing locations but not dates so one cannot be certain of 
entries  Bill
 
 Sent from my iPhone  
 On Aug 1, 2019, at 8:15 PM, Christopher Seward Sr. <csewar...@gmail.com> wrote:
 
  
   
      
You are free to record as you choose, but keep in mind that if you publish & 
share this information, your method goes against the standard, and can  cause 
issues.  
 
 
An example for me was importing a person's info into my file.  I kept getting 
import errors stating the the location (birth place) did  not exist on that 
date (birth date).  Now I have an issue, since this place not only didn't exist 
when this person was born, but  when it did exist, it was in a different 
country than when he was born, thus making him appear to be of one heritage, 
but was actually another.
 
I recommend ALWAYS putting the correct location in, and putting the current 
name of the location  in the notes.
 
 On 8/1/2019 4:41 PM, James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup wrote:
  
 
     Yes, but in the notes.  Most people I share my information with want to 
know where the place is now.  They, like Trump, have no regard for history, and 
those who know  their history, already know what the original name is.  Looking 
for documents, the current place will know what jurisdiction they once  were  
governed by.  It is all about being usable for current people.  Otherwise, we 
would all be recording everying in Latin like they once did. 
   Hoosierly yours, 
  James G. Hermsen 8108 Laura Lynne Lane Indianapolis, IN 46217 
  317-679-1466 cell 317-881-4600 land line    
  
      On ‎Thursday‎, ‎August‎ ‎01‎, ‎2019‎ ‎01‎:‎22‎:‎29‎ ‎PM‎ ‎EDT, 
sarrazingeor...@gmail.com <sarrazingeor...@gmail.com> wrote:  
  
      
I think one should always the name of a  location the way it is indicated in 
the documentation.
 
If the name has change or if two locations  have been merge, I use curly 
brackets with the new name  after the old name.
 
Ex.  Romorantin {Romorantin-Lanthenay},  41194, Loir-et-Cher, Centre-Val de 
Loire, France
 
(Note : I use 5 fields)
 
  
 
Georges
 
  
   
De : LegacyUserGroup <legacyusergroup-boun...@legacyusers.com> De la part de 
James G. Hermsen via  LegacyUserGroup
 Envoyé : 1 août 2019 09:26
 À : mvmcgrs--- via LegacyUserGroup  <legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com>
 Cc : James G. Hermsen <jherm...@yahoo.com>
 Objet : Re: [LegacyUG] Location names  for Pennsylvania
    
 
  
I always use the current geographic location and name today in each entry and 
in the notes, remark  that the geographic name and country was  different then 
than it is  today.  That way when a grandchild (or  anyone) wants to find the 
place on a map is able to do so.  Prussia is very hard to find, if  you did not 
know where to look. Same thing with names of cities whose name has  changed.  
Stalingrad, Linengrad don't  make sense for someone born after the Cold  War.   
Peking vs. Bejing.  Same thing.
   
  
    
Hoosierly yours,
   
  
   
James G. Hermsen
   
8108 Laura Lynne Lane
   
Indianapolis, IN 46217
   
  
   
317-679-1466 cell
   
317-881-4600 land line
    
  
   
  
     
On ‎Thursday‎, ‎August‎ ‎01‎, ‎2019‎ ‎08‎:‎43‎:‎54‎ ‎AM‎ ‎EDT,  mvmcgrs--- 
viaLegacyUserGroup <legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com> wrote: 
   
  
   
  
        
  
   
  
     
I hope you are not inserting  the the added information if it is not in the 
document.  The jurisdictions  change over time. In the US what was a  county in 
1850 may be another  county in 1860 and still another county  by 1870. The 
house did not  move but the boundaries did.
   
  
   
Marie
 
 Marie Varrelman  Melchiori, Certified Genealogist  Emeritus
______________________________ ______________________________ __
 CG or Certified  Genealogist is a service mark of the Board  for Certification 
 of Genealogists, used under  license by Board-certified genealogists after 
periodic competency  evaluation, and the board name is  registered in the US 
Patent  & Trademark Office.
   
In a message dated 8/1/2019 6:24:51 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
wrlinh...@gmail.com writes: 
   
  
     
I do agree.   
  
  
   
My standard is:   [1. local jurisdiction/repository i.e.township,  village, 
city, etc], 2.County, 3.State, 4.Country  
  
and apply to other countries similarly by always using three commas for all 
locations  [usually each has a repository of  genealogical data] .  The entry 
might between  comma's might be null if I don't have the  information.  For 
example born in USA  might be ", , , USA".  I know I have some research  to do 
but I only record what I have  from that source.
   
  
   
For folder hierarchy and some naming situations I reverse the  order but always 
hold to  4 elements for location.  I don't believe I have ever  had an 
exception.  I am sure I will learn about  one here.  So far this works for me. 
   
  
   
Bill
    
  
    
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 12:20 AM Roberta Schwalm <robertaschw...@gmail.com> 
wrote:
  
  
I do the same thing, Shirley.  Most of my ancestors are from Scotland, Ireland, 
England, Germany and a  spattering of French.  The only difference is I use 
"province" instead of  State.
  
  
   
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 9:05 PM Shirley Crampton <scshenders...@gmail.com> 
wrote:
  
  
I use Village, County, State, Country.  Hopefully there is no more than 1 
village of the same name in  the County.  If the place is rural then I put the 
name of the township in  the first position.
  
  
   
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 5:47 PM Connie Laubach <bluecorab...@gmail.com> wrote:
  
   
Trying to decide how to input the location names – I have townships that are 
made up of villages and boroughs. How are others handling it?
 
I have thought of the following:
 
Village, township, county, state, United States
 
or
 
township-village, country, state, United States (I like this as  all villages 
within the township would be listed together)
 
 
 
Thank you, Connie.
 
 
 
 
   
  
  
      
  
       
-- 
 
LegacyUserGroup mailing list
 LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
 To manage your subscription and unsubscribe 
http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
 Archives at:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
         -- 
 
 LegacyUserGroup mailing list
 LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
 To manage your subscription and unsubscribe 
http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
 Archives at:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
     
  
 
|  | Virus-free. www.avast.com  |

    
 -- 
 
 LegacyUserGroup mailing list
 LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
 To manage your subscription and unsubscribe 
http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
 Archives at:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
  
   -- 
 
 LegacyUserGroup mailing list
 LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
 To manage your subscription and unsubscribe 
http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
 Archives at:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
      -- 
 
 LegacyUserGroup mailing list
 LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
 To manage your subscription and unsubscribe 
http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
 Archives at:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
 
     -- 
 
LegacyUserGroup mailing list
 LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
To manage your subscription and unsubscribe 
http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
Archives at:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
     
  
-- 

LegacyUserGroup mailing list
LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
To manage your subscription and unsubscribe 
http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
Archives at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

-- 

LegacyUserGroup mailing list
LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
To manage your subscription and unsubscribe 
http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
Archives at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
  
-- 

LegacyUserGroup mailing list
LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
To manage your subscription and unsubscribe 
http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
Archives at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Reply via email to