James,

Again, if you choose not to use the Genealogical Standard for places that is your choice but as was said, don't publish it for those that do. It is not policing it is the standard set by the Genealogists!

Russ

P.S this is starting to get old!!

On 8/3/2019 3:14 PM, James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup wrote:
I never had a Gedcom file not accept any location file whether it had Indianapolis, Marion Co., IN, or even Indianapolis, IN. not to mention Indianapolis, xxx Township, Marion County, Indiana, United States of America.  You soon get the point that the latter is the creation of someone who thinks that they need to police something totally not needed by anyone with common sense, or a tad bit of education.

Hoosierly yours,

James G. Hermsen
8108 Laura Lynne Lane
Indianapolis, IN 46217

317-679-1466 cell
317-881-4600 land line


On ‎Saturday‎, ‎August‎ ‎03‎, ‎2019‎ ‎09‎:‎43‎:‎25‎ ‎AM‎ ‎EDT, <[email protected]> wrote:


Christopher

I agree with you.

My suggestion of putting the present name between curly brackets after the referenced location name is simply an easy way to translate old location name into present day name and it is accepted by the different Gedcom programs.

Georges

*De :*LegacyUserGroup <[email protected]> *De la part de* Christopher Seward Sr
*Envoyé :* 3 août 2019 09:21
*À :* Legacy User Group <[email protected]>
*Objet :* Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania

James, I understand where you're coming from. I just think that handling data in a manner that deviates from the standard is inviting data integrity issues. As I said,  the choice is yours. Just be aware of the lasting issues it will cause for those who come after.

Christopher

On Sat, Aug 3, 2019, 4:59 AM James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Exactly my point.  Putting historical location in the notes
    maintains all the information one needs and still be sensible and
    useful to family members.  If people import information without
    looking at the notes, then they are not being a good genealogist.
      It tells me that they just copy things for numbers, not for
    reliable and useful information to share.

    Hoosierly yours,

    James G. Hermsen

    8108 Laura Lynne Lane

    Indianapolis, IN 46217

    317-679-1466 cell

    317-881-4600 land line

    On ‎Friday‎, ‎August‎ ‎02‎, ‎2019‎ ‎08‎:‎51‎:‎50‎ ‎AM‎ ‎EDT, Bill
    Hoff <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Then one cannot find on a map if historic locations used. With
    many relatives in West Virginia I have this problem. WV did not
    become a state until June 20, 1863.  On top of that many counties
    within the state were divided over many years, far too many for me
    to recall them all. Then there is the problem of knowing locations
    but not dates so one cannot be certain of entries

    Bill

    Sent from my iPhone


    On Aug 1, 2019, at 8:15 PM, Christopher Seward Sr.
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    You are free to record as you choose, but keep in mind that if you
    publish & share this information, your method goes against the
    standard, and can cause issues.

    An example for me was importing a person's info into my file.  I
    kept getting import errors stating the the location (birth place)
    did not exist on that date (birth date).  Now I have an issue,
    since this place not only didn't exist when this person was born,
    but when it did exist, it was in a different country than when he
    was born, thus making him appear to be of one heritage, but was
    actually another.

    I recommend ALWAYS putting the correct location in, and putting
    the current name of the location in the notes.

    On 8/1/2019 4:41 PM, James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup wrote:

    Yes, but in the notes.  Most people I share my information with
    want to know where the place is now.  They, like Trump, have no
    regard for history, and those who know their history, already know
    what the original name is. Looking for documents, the current
    place will know what jurisdiction they once were governed by.  It
    is all about being usable for current people.  Otherwise, we would
    all be recording everying in Latin like they once did.

    Hoosierly yours,

    James G. Hermsen

    8108 Laura Lynne Lane

    Indianapolis, IN 46217

    317-679-1466 cell

    317-881-4600 land line

    On ‎Thursday‎, ‎August‎ ‎01‎, ‎2019‎ ‎01‎:‎22‎:‎29‎ ‎PM‎ ‎EDT,
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

    I think one should always the name of a location the way it is
    indicated in the documentation.

    If the name has change or if two locations have been merge, I use
    curly brackets with the new name after the old name.

    Ex.  Romorantin {Romorantin-Lanthenay}, 41194, Loir-et-Cher,
    Centre-Val de Loire, France

    (Note : I use 5 fields)

    Georges

    *De :*LegacyUserGroup <[email protected]>
    <mailto:[email protected]> *De la part de*
    James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup
    *Envoyé :* 1 août 2019 09:26
    *À :* mvmcgrs--- via LegacyUserGroup
    <[email protected]>
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Cc :* James G. Hermsen <[email protected]>
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Objet :* Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania

    I always use the current geographic location and name today in
    each entry and in the notes, remark that the geographic name and
    country was different then than it is today.  That way when a
    grandchild (or anyone) wants to find the place on a map is able to
    do so.  Prussia is very hard to find, if you did not know where to
    look. Same thing with names of cities whose name has changed.
    Stalingrad, Linengrad don't make sense for someone born after the
    Cold War.   Peking vs. Bejing. Same thing.

    Hoosierly yours,

    James G. Hermsen

    8108 Laura Lynne Lane

    Indianapolis, IN 46217

    317-679-1466 cell

    317-881-4600 land line

    On ‎Thursday‎, ‎August‎ ‎01‎, ‎2019‎ ‎08‎:‎43‎:‎54‎ ‎AM‎ ‎EDT,
    mvmcgrs--- via LegacyUserGroup <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I hope you are not inserting the the added information if it is
    not in the document. The jurisdictions change over time. In the US
    what was a county in 1850 may be another county in 1860 and still
    another county by 1870. The house did not move but the boundaries did.

    Marie

    Marie Varrelman Melchiori, Certified Genealogist Emeritus
    ______________________________ ______________________________ __
    CG or Certified Genealogist is a service mark of the Board for
    Certification of Genealogists, used under license by
    Board-certified genealogists after periodic competency evaluation,
    and the board name is registered in the US Patent & Trademark Office.

    In a message dated 8/1/2019 6:24:51 AM Eastern Standard Time,
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> writes:

    I do agree.

    My standard is:   [1. local jurisdiction/repository i.e.township,
    village, city, etc], 2.County, 3.State, 4.Country

    and apply to other countries similarly by always using three
    commas for all locations [usually each has a repository of
    genealogical data] .  The entry might between comma's might be
    null if I don't have the information. For example born in USA
    might be ", , , USA".  I know I have some research to do but I
    only record what I have from that source.

    For folder hierarchy and some naming situations I reverse the
    order but always hold to 4 elements for location.  I don't believe
    I have ever had an exception.  I am sure I will learn about one
    here.  So far this works for me.

    Bill

    On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 12:20 AM Roberta Schwalm
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        I do the same thing, Shirley.  Most of my ancestors are from
        Scotland, Ireland, England, Germany and a spattering of
        French.  The only difference is I use "province" instead of State.

        On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 9:05 PM Shirley Crampton
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            I use Village, County, State, Country. Hopefully there is
            no more than 1 village of the same name in the County. If
            the place is rural then I put the name of the township in
            the first position.

            On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 5:47 PM Connie Laubach
            <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
            wrote:

                Trying to decide how to input the location names – I
                have townships that are made up of villages and
                boroughs. How are others handling it?

                I have thought of the following:

                Village, township, county, state, United States

                or

                township-village, country, state, United States (I
                like this as  all villages within the township would
                be listed together)

                Thank you, Connie.

--
    LegacyUserGroup mailing list
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    To manage your subscription and unsubscribe
    http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
    Archives at:
    http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

--
    LegacyUserGroup mailing list
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    To manage your subscription and unsubscribe
    http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
    Archives at:
    http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

    
https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-round-orange-animated-no-repeat-v1.gif
    
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=icon>

        

    Virus-free. www.avast.com
    
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=link>


--
        LegacyUserGroup mailing list
        [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        To manage your subscription and unsubscribe
        http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
        Archives at:
        http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

--
    LegacyUserGroup mailing list
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    To manage your subscription and unsubscribe
    http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
    Archives at:
    http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

--
    LegacyUserGroup mailing list
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    To manage your subscription and unsubscribe
    http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
    Archives at:
    http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

--

LegacyUserGroup mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
To manage your subscription and unsubscribe http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
Archives at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

-- 

LegacyUserGroup mailing list
[email protected]
To manage your subscription and unsubscribe 
http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
Archives at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Reply via email to