The Year 2000 problem is a PC problem, NOT Legacy. Legacy probably uses the
default date of the computer, which is the "short date" format (only 2
digits on older computers and then converts it). To fix the problem, go to
Control Panel, Regional Settings, select the 'Date' Tab and change the SHORT
date format from m/d/yy to mm/dd/yyyy. This will fix the problem if your
computer is Y2K compliant. If this does not work, your PC's CMOS is NOT Y2K
compliant and will need to be upgraded or replaced. Hope this is helpful!
Ron
----- Original Message -----
From: List Server <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 1999 10:38 AM
Subject: [LegacyUserGroup DIGEST]
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< LEGACY >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> Date: Tue, 05 Oct 1999 13:06:10 +1000
> From: Noel Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Legacy - Y2K Compliance.
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi to the list,
>
> I have a question regarding Legacy and whether it is compliant in
> relation to the Year 2000 problem.
>
> On all my reports, I have selected the option to have the 'date of
> modification' printed on the bottom of reports. Up until now, the date
> has printed in the format, like "Printed by Legacy 25 Jun 1999".
>
> In a recent experiment to check out my computer, I purposely set the
> system date to '1 January 2000', printed out a report, and noted the
> following "Printed by Legacy 1 Jan". NOTE -- no year was printed.
>
> So questions arising -
>
> - Is Legacy Year 2000 compliant ?
>
> - Why would the year missing from in the example above ?
>
> Any suggestions would be appreciated.
>
> Noel Watkins
> (Melbourne, Australia)
>
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< LEGACY >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> From: "Mark Stoughton and Tanya Willow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 23:20:45 -0400
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy - Y2K Compliance.
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Legacy stores dates as a character string, using an 8 digit format
> (YYYYMMDD), so your data is safe. Microsoft Access 2.0 (Which Legacy 2.0
is
> based on), is Not Y2K compliant if dates are stored in a 2 digit format.
>
> Legacy DOES NOT use Access's date functions for family data, but it may
use
> Access's internal date function to generate the date on the reports, which
> may not be compliant, hence the blank date.
>
> Let me repeat, YOUR GENEALOGY DATA IS SAFE IN LEGACY 2.0
>
> Mark Stoughton
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Noel
> > Watkins
> > Sent: Monday, October 04, 1999 11:06 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [LegacyUG] Legacy - Y2K Compliance.
> >
> >
> > Hi to the list,
> >
> > I have a question regarding Legacy and whether it is compliant in
> > relation to the Year 2000 problem.
> >
> > On all my reports, I have selected the option to have the 'date of
> > modification' printed on the bottom of reports. Up until now, the date
> > has printed in the format, like "Printed by Legacy 25 Jun 1999".
> >
> > In a recent experiment to check out my computer, I purposely set the
> > system date to '1 January 2000', printed out a report, and noted the
> > following "Printed by Legacy 1 Jan". NOTE -- no year was printed.
> >
> > So questions arising -
> >
> > - Is Legacy Year 2000 compliant ?
> >
> > - Why would the year missing from in the example above ?
> >
> > Any suggestions would be appreciated.
> >
> > Noel Watkins
> > (Melbourne, Australia)
> >
>
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< LEGACY >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> From: "Gail M. Gordon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 22:47:51 -0500
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Question about Listing Children
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I simply put Unknown Gender in the Given Name field, fill in the surname,
> check the ? for gender, and attach whatever info I know in the source
> detail. On the other hand when I know an infant that died was a male or
> female (but not named) I put either Male or Female as the given name.
>
> Gail Gordon
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.execpc.com/~gmgordon
> Milwaukee, WI
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ardeth Randall [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 04, 1999 7:13 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Question about Listing Children
>
> Hello.
> I would like to know how other users of Legacy handle the situation
> when the sex of a person is listed as Unknown and they died as an infant.
> Marv
> Randall (a new Legacy user) since July
> << File: ATT00001.htm >>
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< LEGACY >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> Date: Mon, 04 Oct 1999 22:02:00 -0600
> From: "Geoffrey D. Rasmussen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Superscripts
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Dittos to the superscripted source references!
>
> "Also, I would like to have an _option_ to use "superscripts" for
> reference numbers instead of the bracketed numbers as shown in your
> example. I think the "superscripts" are neater, take less space and are
> less distracting from the report or data presented.
>
> Regards - William Perkins
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
>
>
> Geoff
>
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< LEGACY >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> From: "Michael Crocker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 00:48:33 -0400
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Question about Listing Children
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Infant (if unknown gender)
> Infant son
> Infant dau.
>
> as it is typically done on tombstones
>
>
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< LEGACY >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 09:32:15 EDT
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Question about Listing Children
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > I would like to know how other users of Legacy handle the situation
> when
> > the sex of a person is listed as Unknown and they died as an infant.
>
> Marv -- As a new user you may not have noticed that there are three gender
> choice options in the edit screen, right under the calendar and address
icons
> at the top of the screen. I know I didn't notice these for quite a while.
> You can choose "add son" or "add daughter" and then tick the ? choice once
> you have the edit screen to work with. You can also use these to change a
> gender if you accidentally use the wrong one. I also use this ? when it
is a
> name which could be either male or female, but I don't know which one.
I've
> also changed my color/font for the ? children so they are scripted in
magenta
> italics in my program so I don't overlook the fact that they are an
unknown
> gender. Purely a personal preference.
>
> In the case of an unnamed infant death, I just enter "Infant" as the name.
>
> There are so many neat little tricks in Legacy. Enjoy!
>
> Ann
> ************************************
> Harbeson: Warmoth/Huntley
> Researching: WARMOTH, HUNTLEY, ANDREWS, DUCKER, KAUFFMAN, GATES
> HARBESON, EVANS, PALMER, RISSLER
> Support Free Internet Genealogy by supporting Rootsweb at
> http://www.rootsweb.com/rootsweb/how-to-subscribe.html
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< LEGACY >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> Date: Tue, 05 Oct 1999 08:50:56 -0700
> From: Henry Thorsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Unwanted comments
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In my preview of a Modified Register (descendant) Book under the
> information of 4 different ancestors the comment "name of my ancestor,
> lived with someone." These comments never appeared before. My last build
> was Sept. 10. How do I get rid of these one line comments? Any help would
> be most appreciated.
>
> Henry
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< LEGACY >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> From: "Gail M. Gordon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 11:16:04 -0500
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Unwanted comments
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> These appear when you have a marriage status of "unmarried" checked in the
> marriage record of a couple. Has been this way for a long time. You can
> change the marriage status, but if they were truly unmarried and you don't
> check anything the report will show them as husband and wife. The only
> solution (that I know of) is to create a word processing file and remove
> the offending comment in your word processor or change it to something
more
> acceptable to you.
>
> Gail Gordon
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.execpc.com/~gmgordon
> Milwaukee, WI
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henry Thorsen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 1999 10:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Unwanted comments
>
> In my preview of a Modified Register (descendant) Book under the
> information of 4 different ancestors the comment "name of my ancestor,
> lived with someone." These comments never appeared before. My last build
> was Sept. 10. How do I get rid of these one line comments? Any help would
> be most appreciated.
>
> Henry
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< LEGACY >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> From: "Gail M. Gordon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 13:36:29 -0500
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Child Status
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Have just been thinking about child status. A number of statuses apply to
> individuals whether or not they are a child or an adult. What got me
> started is that I have a 2nd gr-grandmother who was adopted, but I have
not
> found her parents yet (just looking for adoptive parents at this point).
> The only way I can show an adopted status is to use a child status code
of
> adopted, but if I don't have parents for an individual then this
individual
> is not a child anyplace. I can give them "unknown" parents, but I would
> rather not do that. Right now I just record it in a note or event which I
> guess works ok, but ...
>
> The statuses of twin, adopted, etc would apply to an individual for their
> whole life not just as a child as opposed to a status of "stillborn" which
> of course would only apply to a child.
>
> Maybe I'm making more out of this than necessary, but think it would be
> nice to have a status code for an individual as opposed to a child. Don't
> want anything complicated or to have duplicate child and individual
> statuses, but maybe there is someway to indicate a status when the
> individual does not show as a child of anyone.
>
>
>
>
> Gail Gordon
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.execpc.com/~gmgordon
> Milwaukee, WI
>
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< LEGACY >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> From: "Louise Par" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 15:04:37 -0400
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Child Status
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gail,
> The adoption would be something good to put into an Event for your 2nd
> gr-grandmother.
>
> Louise -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gail M. Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 'Legacy List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tuesday, October 05, 1999 2:34 PM
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Child Status
>
>
> >Have just been thinking about child status. A number of statuses apply
> to
> >individuals whether or not they are a child or an adult. What got me
> >started is that I have a 2nd gr-grandmother who was adopted, but I have
> not
> >found her parents yet (just looking for adoptive parents at this
> point).
> > The only way I can show an adopted status is to use a child status
> code of
> >adopted, but if I don't have parents for an individual then this
> individual
> >is not a child anyplace. I can give them "unknown" parents, but I would
> >rather not do that. Right now I just record it in a note or event which
> I
> >guess works ok, but ...
> >
> >The statuses of twin, adopted, etc would apply to an individual for
> their
> >whole life not just as a child as opposed to a status of "stillborn"
> which
> >of course would only apply to a child.
> >
> >Maybe I'm making more out of this than necessary, but think it would be
> >nice to have a status code for an individual as opposed to a child.
> Don't
> >want anything complicated or to have duplicate child and individual
> >statuses, but maybe there is someway to indicate a status when the
> >individual does not show as a child of anyone.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Gail Gordon
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >http://www.execpc.com/~gmgordon
> >Milwaukee, WI
> >
>
>
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< LEGACY >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> From: "Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 14:10:33 -0700
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Adoptive Father, Birth Mother
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Legacy Users:
>
> This may help in defining the exact nature of an adoption by a
step-parent:
>
> 1. Enter the adoptive child just as you would any other.
> 2. In Family View with the parents in Husb and Wife position, right click
on
> the adopted child and select Children's Settings from the popup menu.
> 3. Highliight the adopted child in the Children box and click on the
> drop-down arrow in the Status field.
> 4. You can Add your own Child Status definitions. For example: "Adopted
by
> Father: Birth Mother" or "Adopted ny Mother: Birth Father" would
distinguish
> an adoption by a step-parent.
>
> Your comments are welcome.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Jim Terry
> Technical Support
> Millenia Corporation
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
>
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< LEGACY >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> From: "Gail M. Gordon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 19:26:27 -0500
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Adoptive Father, Birth Mother
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I like this idea. I might want to modify the wording - still thinking
> about it. One thing - this field only accepts 30 char. Any chance of
> lengthening the field?
>
> Gail Gordon
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.execpc.com/~gmgordon
> Milwaukee, WI
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 1999 4:11 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Adoptive Father, Birth Mother
>
> Legacy Users:
>
> This may help in defining the exact nature of an adoption by a
step-parent:
>
> 1. Enter the adoptive child just as you would any other.
> 2. In Family View with the parents in Husb and Wife position, right click
> on
> the adopted child and select Children's Settings from the popup menu.
> 3. Highliight the adopted child in the Children box and click on the
> drop-down arrow in the Status field.
> 4. You can Add your own Child Status definitions. For example: "Adopted
by
> Father: Birth Mother" or "Adopted ny Mother: Birth Father" would disting
> uish
> an adoption by a step-parent.
>
> Your comments are welcome.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Jim Terry
> Technical Support
> Millenia Corporation
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< LEGACY >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> Date: Tue, 05 Oct 1999 23:58:10 -0700
> From: Peggy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Problem with an event type
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I am a new user of Legacy and like it far more so far than the other two
> programs I've used.
> Maybe someone can help me with an annoying problem.
>
> I have an event called Death Cause.
> Before I use that event, on my source screen, there is a death cause. But
I
> don't know how to access it without using my event: Death Cause. When I
do,
> There are two entries for Death Cause on my source screen. When I try to
> edit event types, only one shows up. Is there another way to enter the
> cause of death without adding an event? Is there any way to get rid of the
> two entries for cause of death on my source screen?
>
> Thank you for any help you can give.
> Peggy
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< LEGACY >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> From: "H. Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 23:14:35 -0500
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Problem with an event type
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Peggy;
> Look at notes,Medical,top frame
> Henry
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Peggy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 1999 1:58 AM
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Problem with an event type
>
>
> > I am a new user of Legacy and like it far more so far than
> the other two
> > programs I've used.
> > Maybe someone can help me with an annoying problem.
> >
> > I have an event called Death Cause.
> > Before I use that event, on my source screen, there is a
> death cause. But I
> > don't know how to access it without using my event: Death
> Cause. When I do,
> > There are two entries for Death Cause on my source screen.
> When I try to
> > edit event types, only one shows up. Is there another way
> to enter the
> > cause of death without adding an event? Is there any way
> to get rid of the
> > two entries for cause of death on my source screen?
> >
> > Thank you for any help you can give.
> > Peggy
> >
>
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< LEGACY >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 21:31:42 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Lori Mell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Mountlake-Lynnwood User Group
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sorry I haven't gotten back to you sooner, but with my
> schedule sometimes it's hard to read all my e-mail. I
> would like to meet sometime regarding the Legacy
> program--it just depends on my schedule. Besides
> work, I have class one night a week plus study group,
> along with an on-line class I'm taking that requires
> quite a bit of time.
>
> Let me know, ok.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Lori
>
>
>
> =====
> "Keep on shining, keep on smiling,
> Don't lose faith and don't lose heart
> When you're crying, just keep trying to remind yourself
> You're the shining star that you are
> Don't ever lose the light in your eyes"
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< LEGACY >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> Date: Tue, 05 Oct 1999 22:46:43 -0700
> From: Donna Newell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Question about Listing Children
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > >
> >
> > In the case of an unnamed infant death, I just enter "Infant" as the
name.
> >
> >
> >
> I really believe that you should leave blank if you do not know the name
of the
> child in questions. "Names" such as "infant", "child", "unknown",
"stillborn",
> "female" and "male" do not designate the actual child's name. Legacy will
> through in if I am not mistaken Mr. or Miss. In real genealogy those terms
are
> not used in place of name for a child. It doesn't matter if you do not
know the
> name, logic should say the name is unknown. Also if you have checked
female
> then why put female in the name field. Age at death should also give you
a
> clue. Why not put your extraneous information in your notes field.
>
> dn
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< LEGACY >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> From: "Dave Berdan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2000 02:26:41 -0800
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy - Y2K Compliance.
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Noel,
>
> Legacy works fine for me when I set my computer clock to 1 Jan 2000
> (and other dates). The "Printed by Legacy on 1 Jan 2000" comes out
> just fine. How old is your computer? Is anyone else experiencing
> this situation if the computer date is set to 2000?
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Dave Berdan
> President, Millennia Corp
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Noel Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Monday, October 04, 1999 7:06 PM
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Legacy - Y2K Compliance.
>
>
> >Hi to the list,
> >
> >I have a question regarding Legacy and whether it is compliant in
> >relation to the Year 2000 problem.
> >
> >On all my reports, I have selected the option to have the 'date of
> >modification' printed on the bottom of reports. Up until now, the
> date
> >has printed in the format, like "Printed by Legacy 25 Jun 1999".
> >
> >In a recent experiment to check out my computer, I purposely set the
> >system date to '1 January 2000', printed out a report, and noted the
> >following "Printed by Legacy 1 Jan". NOTE -- no year was printed.
> >
> >So questions arising -
> >
> >- Is Legacy Year 2000 compliant ?
> >
> >- Why would the year missing from in the example above ?
> >
> >Any suggestions would be appreciated.
> >
> >Noel Watkins
> >(Melbourne, Australia)
> >
> >
>
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< LEGACY >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> From: "Michele & Gary Wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 07:14:21 -0700
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Temple Name Submissions/Photo Linking
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I am having trouble understanding the procedure of submitting names to the
> temple. I made some batch files which were generated as *.ged. I took
> these to the FHC to run through temple ready. When I brought my disk back
> home to have Legacy mark the people who had been cleared, I couldn't get
it
> to read my files. The extension on the files generated was *.xxx. I've
> never seen this type of file before. I don't understand what I'm supposed
> to do. Can someone help me?
> I'm also having a problem with linking my photos to my Legacy data. Some
of
> the time, when I go to add a picture, I am not able to preview my pictures
> even though the box is checked. Part of the time the first picture I
select
> is the preview no matter what picture I select. This is very strange.
>
> Thanks,
> Michele
>
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< LEGACY >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> From: "Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 07:50:28 -0700
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Adoptive Father, Birth Mother
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Within the current limits of the field, you could also put "Adopted by
> StepDad. Birth Mom" or "Adopted by StepMom. Birth Dad." I don't know if
the
> field will be longer in Legacy 3.0 to be released in November.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Jim Terry
> Technical Support
> Millenia Corporation
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gail
> M. Gordon
> Sent: 05 October, 1999 5:26 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Adoptive Father, Birth Mother
>
>
> I like this idea. I might want to modify the wording - still thinking
> about it. One thing - this field only accepts 30 char. Any chance of
> lengthening the field?
>
> Gail Gordon
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.execpc.com/~gmgordon
> Milwaukee, WI
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 1999 4:11 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Adoptive Father, Birth Mother
>
> Legacy Users:
>
> This may help in defining the exact nature of an adoption by a
step-parent:
>
> 1. Enter the adoptive child just as you would any other.
> 2. In Family View with the parents in Husb and Wife position, right click
> on
> the adopted child and select Children's Settings from the popup menu.
> 3. Highliight the adopted child in the Children box and click on the
> drop-down arrow in the Status field.
> 4. You can Add your own Child Status definitions. For example: "Adopted
by
> Father: Birth Mother" or "Adopted ny Mother: Birth Father" would disting
> uish
> an adoption by a step-parent.
>
> Your comments are welcome.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Jim Terry
> Technical Support
> Millenia Corporation
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
>
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< LEGACY >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> From: "Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 08:36:13 -0700
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Temple Name Submissions/Photo Linking
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Michele:
>
> I don't know what to say about a Submission Report with a .xxx extension.
> Have you tried renaming the file with a .sub extension?
>
> Here is how it is supposed to work:
>
> 1. Put your diskette with the submission report in the a: drive.
> 2. Click the Temple button on the Toolbar.
> 3. Select Read Temple File from the pull-down menu.
> 4. In the Read Temple File screen, change the drive to a: and click on the
> file name. (Has a .sub or .bac extension.)
>
> (You can also read in a TempleReady Report File, which is more complete,
> provided you follow the steps to create a file with a .prn extension.)
>
> As far as pictures go, I have seen this problem in other applications when
> one or both of the following conditions exist:
>
> * Not enough memory.
> * Large picure file size.
>
> Sometimes if the first picture in the list is very large, the preview will
> "hang" or take a very long time to change to other filenames you click on.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Jim Terry
> Technical Support
> Millenia Corporation
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Michele & Gary Wong
> Sent: 06 October, 1999 7:14 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Temple Name Submissions/Photo Linking
>
>
> I am having trouble understanding the procedure of submitting names to the
> temple. I made some batch files which were generated as *.ged. I took
> these to the FHC to run through temple ready. When I brought my disk back
> home to have Legacy mark the people who had been cleared, I couldn't get
it
> to read my files. The extension on the files generated was *.xxx. I've
> never seen this type of file before. I don't understand what I'm supposed
> to do. Can someone help me?
> I'm also having a problem with linking my photos to my Legacy data. Some
of
> the time, when I go to add a picture, I am not able to preview my pictures
> even though the box is checked. Part of the time the first picture I
select
> is the preview no matter what picture I select. This is very strange.
>
> Thanks,
> Michele
>
>
>
