Exactly! There does seem to be a mind-set amongst users who were perhaps conditioned (as I was) by earlier programs eg. PAF 2+, where only four data entry points where the "norm". Then you were limited as to how you could enter a location. And to facilitate "searching" it was necessary to have everything "slotted" correctly. Modern programs, like Legacy have no such entry restrictions, so it is case of enter what suits you and those you exchange records with. Great! Why not put name of the cemetery [If Known] in the Place/Address field of the [Buried] entry for the individual entry on the family view? Buried [Field1] Date [Field 2] Place Name & Address ie: Buried 11 Jan 1862 City of London Cemetery , Ilford or Buried[20 Jan 1941 Manor Park Cemetery, Sebert road, Manor Park, London On Thu, 25 May 2000 12:01:09 +1000, Lance wrote: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++== Why is the PLACE name not a good place to put the name of the Cemetery/Church/Property/Residence, etc.? Is it not part of the "location"? -----Original Message----- From: "Elizabeth Fischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Or add a field that states Cemetery name..... ----- Original Message ----- From: Ann Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I like you, do not feel the location field is the place for the cemetery name.
