There is a very simple way to deal with the subject. Let's just discard the term "Genealogy" and start calling them Family History Programs. If we cover every possible situation there is no purpose in maintaining the lie is there?
Hugh At 03:43 AM 3/27/2002 -0700, you wrote: >From: "Jim Winfrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Netherlands or Vermont > >I agree that we've let this thread run its course. But, sometime in the >future, Wim's arguments have to be addressed. With some churches now >performing and blessing same-sex marriages and the possibility of people in >same sex marriages having children through in-vitro fertilization, the >definition of family is changing whether we like it or not. I guess the way >I would summarize it is - if the child born to a same-sex union was a >distant relative it wouldn't be a major issue to us. But what if it is 30 >years from now and that person was our father or mother? Then, I suspect, >we would be clamoring for Legacy to find a way to deal with it. > >Jim To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
