Myrna, a suggestion to prevent this sort of problem If I do not have a birthdate for an individual, I *always* enter an estimated date e.g. est 1822
It helps so much with sorting sometimes, and looking at the Index View and seeing someone who has no birthdate often just doesn't trigger a memory for me. Once all your individuals have "something" for a birthdate, Legacy will automatically determine Living or Not. HTH - RonKZ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Myrna Jorgensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 09 August 2004 09:57 Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] they rose from the dead | Cathy, | I checked out the Advanced Set Living and it would be great - IF - there | was a date of birth. I ran it anyway and it did change some of mine but | there are still lots to correct that do not have a date of birth or death. | Surely someone whose parents were born and died in the 17 or 1800's would be | dead by now. | Hope I never have to do this again. | Myrna | | | Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at: | http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp | | To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: | http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/ | | To unsubscribe please visit: | http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/ To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp
