Thanks a lot that is good news.
But when you design this great new feature I would appreciate if you also could add a sorting order in the view locations where the top level is first (eg. countires).
They are registred in the normal way detail, .. , .. , no detail .
I would like it look something like.
Sweden,Norrbotten,R�ne�,Avafors Sweden,Norrbotten,R�ne�, Str�msund USA,California,Alameda,Berkeley
If the most detailed entity is missing or has a level more then 4 sort after the entities that are available.
eg.
Sweden,Norrbotten,�verlule�,Skatamark Sweden,Norrbotten,�verlule�,Skatamark,Skatamark5
Sven-Ove
At 08:33 AM 12/7/2004, you wrote:
Our development team has been following the discussion about the proper data entry of locations. We agree, and understand that all locations will not fit into a strict "4-location" format.
I received permission :) to let you all know that in the future we will work to accommodate location data entry of these other variations. However, we still suggest to be consistent in whatever method you are using.
This will not come in the immediate near future as we are working hard on other aspects, but it will come....
Thanks,
Geoff Rasmussen Millennia Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/
To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/
To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp
