Ron, I think I was drawing upon my systems analyst/programming background and surmising that Millenia may be in a position now where they need to choose where to apply their resources, and since there are better charting tools available, they are currently choosing to improve their application in the areas where they are the industry leader. Part of their cost/benefit analyses. ;) --Paula
Paula, I don't think it is a matter that users prefer charting with other software. The problem is, Legacy doesn't offer the charting capabilities of other software, so users have no choice. This has been discussed numerous times in the past. One of the areas that Legacy falls seriously short in is it's charting capabilities. I am one of those people who would prefer not to use add ons, but often, you are not offered any alternatives. Ron Bernier Woonsocket, RI On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 16:34:16 -0600, Paula Ryburn wrote: > Gene, > I assume this is one of the first reports (charts, really) that > they developed and they went with the "standard" - birth, marriage > and death dates & places. I suspect they have not made it more > flexible because the amount of work is great compared to the demand > of users - given the number of users that prefer charting with > other software. I base these thoughts on what I've read here on > the LUG list. --Paula Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/ To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp
