I have confronted the only three living relatives that would have knowledge of what happened and have three different stories.
1. The first born was biological to the mother but not the father. (Sister of the mother)
2. The first born was adopted by both parents. The second born was biological to both parents. (Sister to the father)
3. The first and second born were both adopted. (1st cousin to the mother)
Assuming I have no way of verifying any of the stories how should I represent the relationships?
One thought is that I should show all children as biological to the parents since we don't have all the facts. We really don't know for absolute certainty that any of the stories represent what really happened. After all there could've been a fourth story that both children are biological to both parents and I just haven't heard it because anyone who "knew" is not available to tell.
The "family" says just put all children in as biological and let the readers draw their own conclusions from the dates since any commentary may be incorrect unless I can come up with documentation to for the commentary.
What to do? What to do?
Gordon
----- Original Message ----- From: "J. Hugh Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 11:58 AM
Subject: [LegacyUG] e: Keeping track of adopted names
There are genealogists and there are family historians - probably both types<SNIP>
will see your data.
Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/
To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp
