PAF 5 doesn't allow sources for names. The "best" field for the main source is birth date/location -- how you know someone existed and their place in the family. Non-bio child-parent relationships are usually lost or changed in file transfers so I wouldn't enter sources allowed in Legacy 5.

Closest source to the date of birth is usually more reliable than a later census with estimated age or birth year from a tombstone. Exact or estimated date of birth (not just christening or baptism) is needed to make sure that children are in the right order by birth *before* creating a lengthy Legacy descendant "book" report.

A researcher can plan a complex database with a source for every detail BUT it is too much of a chore to remove excess sources and repeated master locations every time a "book" report needs to be edited in a word processor to add pictures one by one.

One readable-size image of a source, like family names from a larger census page is worth more to a reader than a repeated text citation in endnotes for every detail. -- Elizabeth

----- Original Message ----- From: "C.G. Ouimet"
I would find the "Sourcing all Used Fields" option useful if it didn't source the name. What is the value of sourcing the name anyways???


Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/

To unsubscribe please visit:
http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to