[EMAIL PROTECTED] <> wrote on :
 

| Hi Ron,
| 
| I was hoping that wouldn't be the case. I really thought it
| would be fixed.
| I don't mind manually customizing web pages but it sure would
| be nice if we
| didn't have to correct bugs when the code could be changed to
| handle at
| least some of the problems. I've been holding off on
| implementing some stuff
| on my site because I thought some of the suggestions made a
| few months ago
| would have been incorporated in v6. Oh well, I guess the new
| icons were
| higher priority. I think the main problem is that, for most,
| the web page
| generator works just fine. It's only if you want to get
| creative that the
| problems rise to view and that's probably why it has very low
| priority. I still think at least some of the requested changes could
| have 
| been made
| without too much effort. Too bad.
| 
| Gordon Small
| 

My sentiments entirely - I was also holding off until v6 and am most
disappointed that we have mainly cosmetic changes.

--
Rodney HALL 
Heywood, Lancashire

Suaviter sed fortiter
Agreeably but powerfully 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://rmhh.co.uk/
http://rmhh.org.uk/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/

To unsubscribe please visit:
http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to