On 01/10/10 13:43, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
TimSC wrote:
It may be possible to argue that OSMF did try to engage the
community. Rather than me try to make the case, it's more
fun seeing what justifications people are trying to use on the
mailing list!
Seriously?
Seriously, no. :)
I was hinting at something else, and you have interpreted me in a way
that I did not intend. I guess I should make myself clearer in future. I
was jokingly suggesting that I was not trying to steer the discussion
away from irrelevant points (like the ownership of the domain and the
fact that the OSMF board is elected). But really I was trying to get
people to talk about OSMF community engagement. Sorry my hint was not
very obvious.
The REAL reason I don't make that case is I don't believe its valid. But
that is the best approach to demonstrating a mandate IMHO.
Anyway, enjoying a discussing doesn't necessarily imply I am trying to
troll the list. Please assume good faith.
TimSC
_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
