On Oct 1, 2010, at 6:43 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > TimSC wrote: >> It may be possible to argue that OSMF did try to engage the >> community. Rather than me try to make the case, it's more >> fun seeing what justifications people are trying to use on the >> mailing list! > > Seriously? > > You actually see this as some sort of trolling contest, trying to get a rise > out of people because it's "more fun"? > > I've been taking part in the debate because I'm keen to see that > OpenStreetMap has the best licence possible and the most high-quality > geodata under that licence. I realise Liz has already posted elsewhere that > she's aiming to be disruptive, but I hadn't realised that it was some form > of sub-4chan concerted trolling expedition.
You must be new here... Personally I think it's time to consider kickbanning the trolls with the fake names. Half of them got booted from wikipedia it seems, so I don't see why we have to put up with it. Steve stevecoast.com _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
