John Smith wrote: > Thanks for the clarification. In your opinion, what would be the > minimum license rendered images could be licensed as?
An attribution-only licence - CC-BY, for example. > If attribution will also be required on tiles, you have a chain of > attribution that can be followed Right, yes. > if data is licensed in future so > that at least produced data doesn't have an attribution requirement I don't think it can be - the agreement between OSMF and the Contributor to attribute is perpetual, rather than being subject to any future licence change - but even if it were, CT 1.2.2 puts the onus on OSMF to remove the data in the case of incompatibility, rather than on the Contributor to safeguard against all future possibilities. Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/OSM-legal-talk-CTs-and-the-1-April-deadline-tp5887879p5889351.html Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
