Frederik Ramm <frede...@...> writes: >Data that is not fully relicensable, i.e. comes with strings attached, >will always be second-class data in OSM because it carries with it the >potential to cause problems. At the very least it would have to be >flagged as such. Giving everyone the opportunity to add such >second-class data at will (and risking that others who would normally >contribute first-class data build on second-class data and thus produce >something of lesser use to the project) seems a bad choice to me - >worse, actually, than doing our best to explain to everybody why we can >only accept first-class data, and wave a sad goodbye to those who won't >play.
The OSM project only publishes data 'with strings attached'. I think we should not demand from others more than we are willing to do ourselves. -- Ed Avis <e...@waniasset.com> _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
